[isapros] Re: RFC 1149
- From: "Thomas W Shinder" <tshinder@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 13:52:25 -0600
KFC/KCD :)
Thomas W Shinder, M.D.
Site: www.isaserver.org <http://www.isaserver.org/>
Blog: http://blogs.isaserver.org/shinder/
Book: http://tinyurl.com/3xqb7 <http://tinyurl.com/3xqb7>
MVP -- Microsoft Firewalls (ISA)
________________________________
From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Amy Babinchak
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 1:43 PM
To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [isapros] Re: RFC 1149
You have something against chicken?
From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Thomas W Shinder
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 2:29 PM
To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [isapros] Re: RFC 1149
UG!!!
Thomas W Shinder, M.D.
Site: www.isaserver.org <http://www.isaserver.org/>
Blog: http://blogs.isaserver.org/shinder/
Book: http://tinyurl.com/3xqb7
MVP -- Microsoft Firewalls (ISA)
________________________________
From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Thor (Hammer of God)
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 1:26 PM
To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [isapros] Re: RFC 1149
I had to enable the KFC.
t
From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Thomas W Shinder
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 10:40 AM
To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [isapros] Re: RFC 1149
Requires the Firewall client.
Thomas W Shinder, M.D.
Site: www.isaserver.org <http://www.isaserver.org/>
Blog: http://blogs.isaserver.org/shinder/
Book: http://tinyurl.com/3xqb7
MVP -- Microsoft Firewalls (ISA)
________________________________
From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Thor (Hammer of God)
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 12:35 PM
To: isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [isapros] RFC 1149
Has anyone implemented RFC 1149 through ISA yet?
It seems like successful publishing would be problematic, but I'm sure
some of you guys have figured it out.
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1149.html
t
ExchangeDefender Message Security: Check Authenticity
<http://www.exchangedefender.com/verify.asp?id=m0TJi0TN026541&from=amy@h
arborcomputerservices.net>
Other related posts:
