RE: SPF problem: was RE: Publishing an Exchange Server and email still going out through the default IP
- From: "Bryan D. Andrews" <bandrews@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "[ISAserver.org Discussion List]" <isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 13:15:44 -0400
That assumes the following:
* That there is someone who knows linux
* That there is an extra workstation
* That they want another point of failure for email
* That they want to spend the time configuring this
I just feel like this is a hack and it should not be this way.
Might be out of luck huh....?
-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Moffat [mailto:steve@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 9:50 AM
To: [ISAserver.org Discussion List]
Subject: [isalist] RE: SPF problem: was RE: Publishing an Exchange
Server and email still going out through the default IP
http://www.ISAserver.org
Can't they afford an old workstation, with freebie Linux, and one of the
many flavours of mailserver available???
S
-----Original Message-----
From: Bryan D. Andrews [mailto:bandrews@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 10:33 AM
To: ISA Mailing List
Subject: [isalist] RE: SPF problem: was RE: Publishing an Exchange
Server and email still going out through the default IP
http://www.ISAserver.org
Hehe - that is what I am saying... a relay server is not an option at
this point.
I guess I am really trying to find out if there is any movement on this
issue at MS? Or will there be? I know this group would know if there
was... :)
Does checkpoint or other popular firewalls have this issue? I would
think the answer is no.
This should be taken seriously considering the SenderID. Not every
company can afford to create relay servers in a dmz.
Thanks Tom for the reply.
Other related posts:
