Re: RES: Compare ISA Server + Proxy Server 2.0
- From: "Amos Dixon Galiardo" <amos@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "[ISAserver.org Discussion List]" <isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 08:14:57 +0700
thx decarli,
and yes, i did. but is there effect with acl's (policy element, destination
set)?, because i much use it. i use 3 groups. unlimited access group, browse
in unworkhour group, and mail access group (pop3, smtp) and so i use for
specific user not any request for the other port like msn, icq, irq, etc.
i can't use and implement isa server if isa server obviously slow.
i'm waiting for your comments and ideas....
A M O S
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alex Decarli" <decarli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "[ISAserver.org Discussion List]" <isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 3:30 AM
Subject: [isalist] RES: Compare ISA Server + Proxy Server 2.0
http://www.ISAserver.org
The ISA cache enginner is better of proxy.
Read the help and create a initial cache file based on user numbers of LAN.
Alex Decarli
-----Mensagem original-----
De: Amos [mailto:amos@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Enviada em: quarta-feira, 27 de fevereiro de 2002 01:33
Para: [ISAserver.org Discussion List]
Assunto: [isalist] Compare ISA Server + Proxy Server 2.0
http://www.ISAserver.org
Is the ISA Server slower than proxy server? because i use isa server and
proxy server (pararel), and user need much times when they want do browse
in some sites or download email, what should i do in order to make isa
server have fast access...?
------------------------------------------------------
You are currently subscribed to this ISAserver.org Discussion List as:
decarli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send a blank email to $subst('Email.Unsub')
------------------------------------------------------
You are currently subscribed to this ISAserver.org Discussion List as:
amos@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send a blank email to $subst('Email.Unsub')
Other related posts:
