[isalist] Re: NTLM proxy authentication with Linux

  • From: "Greg Mulholland" <gmulholland@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 14:19:44 +1000

http://www.ISAserver.org
-------------------------------------------------------
No the outbound http rule applies to a ad users group, not all users


----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Harrison" <jim@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 1:50 PM
Subject: [isalist] Re: NTLM proxy authentication with Linux



http://www.ISAserver.org -------------------------------------------------------

That's because your rules are anonymous.

Sent to you from Black Hat Las Vegas via WM5-enabled PPC-phone

-----Original Message-----
From: "Greg Mulholland" <gmulholland@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: 8/7/06 18:57
Subject: [isalist] Re: NTLM proxy authentication with Linux

http://www.ISAserver.org
-------------------------------------------------------

not sure whether its single its the limitation of my single nic solution or
not but that doesnt work.

If i untick the "require all users.." button then any users in that group
(ad users group) are allowed un authenticated access.

Greg


----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Harrison" <Jim@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 11:31 AM
Subject: [isalist] Re: NTLM proxy authentication with Linux



http://www.ISAserver.org -------------------------------------------------------

Nope.
You can have authentication without forcing it at the listener.
It's called "user-based rules".


------------------------------------------------------- Jim Harrison MCP(NT4, W2K), A+, Network+, PCG http://isaserver.org/Jim_Harrison/ http://isatools.org Read the help / books / articles! -------------------------------------------------------


-----Original Message----- From: isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Greg Mulholland Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 16:21 To: isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [isalist] Re: NTLM proxy authentication with Linux

http://www.ISAserver.org
-------------------------------------------------------

Then my authentication group which is a requirement becomes null and void as
the authentication isnt checked. so that doesnt work for me

Greg
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Harrison" <Jim@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 1:11 AM
Subject: [isalist] Re: NTLM proxy authentication with Linux


http://www.ISAserver.org -------------------------------------------------------

Disable "require all users..." on the outbound web listener.
If you can't, then you can't have anonymous traffic through it.

-------------------------------------------------------
  Jim Harrison
  MCP(NT4, W2K), A+, Network+, PCG
  http://isas

All mail to and from this domain is GFI-scanned.

------------------------------------------------------
List Archives: //www.freelists.org/archives/isalist/
ISA Server Newsletter: http://www.isaserver.org/pages/newsletter.asp
ISA Server Articles and Tutorials: http://www.isaserver.org/articles_tutorials/
ISA Server Blogs: http://blogs.isaserver.org/
------------------------------------------------------
Visit TechGenix.com for more information about our other sites:
http://www.techgenix.com
------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe visit http://www.isaserver.org/pages/isalist.asp
Report abuse to listadmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx



------------------------------------------------------
List Archives: //www.freelists.org/archives/isalist/ ISA Server Newsletter: http://www.isaserver.org/pages/newsletter.asp ISA Server Articles and Tutorials: http://www.isaserver.org/articles_tutorials/ ISA Server Blogs: http://blogs.isaserver.org/ ------------------------------------------------------
Visit TechGenix.com for more information about our other sites:
http://www.techgenix.com ------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe visit http://www.isaserver.org/pages/isalist.asp Report abuse to listadmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx


Other related posts: