Which dictionary is “fecious” listed in? Everything that I see wants to correct the spelling to facetious. Cordially yours, Jerry G. Young II Product Engineer - Senior Platform Engineering, Enterprise Hosting NTT America, an NTT Communications Company 22451 Shaw Rd. Sterling, VA 20166 Office: 571-434-1319 Fax: 703-333-6749 Email: g.young@xxxxxxxx From: isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Steve Moffat Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 4:19 PM To: ISA Mailing List Subject: [isalist] Re: Limit SMTP connections from several subnets in ISA 2000 Ya get that from your CV? J From: isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jim Harrison Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 5:13 PM To: ISA Mailing List Subject: [isalist] Re: Limit SMTP connections from several subnets in ISA 2000 It is, too… “Fecious”; adj. insultingly tongue-in-cheek. “A smartass with a shitty attitude” From: isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Thor (Hammer of God) Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 11:24 AM To: isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [isalist] Re: Limit SMTP connections from several subnets in ISA 2000 Well, since “fecious” isn’t a word, I can only imagine the closest thing to it... Which, as it happens, does come out of a kitty ;) t On 1/5/07 10:52 AM, "Jim Harrison" <Jim@xxxxxxxxxxxx> spoketh to all: Which; playing with the kitties or being fecious? :-p From: isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Thor (Hammer of God) Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 10:42 AM To: isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [isalist] Re: Limit SMTP connections from several subnets in ISA 2000 Wouldn’t that smell bad? t On 1/5/07 9:25 AM, "Jim Harrison" <Jim@xxxxxxxxxxxx> spoketh to all: “I was just being facetious” – I see; too much playing with the kitties the past two weeks, I guess… I prefer “being fecious”, but that one seems to elude most folks… “SMTP NAT and source IP packet filtering so that I can specify the two Internet subnets that are permitted through.” – this is only possible using Server Publishing; as I stated, packet filters are only useful for ISA-local services. Server Publishing rules allow exceptions that you can use to block unwanted source IPs. “need to deny anonymous SMTP connections” – that’s a completely different-colored barrel of horsemonkeys. I think you mean “unknown”? ISA cannot authenticate SMTP connectio0ns at all. From: isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Danny Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 9:13 AM To: isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [isalist] Re: Limit SMTP connections from several subnets in ISA 2000 On 1/5/07, Jim Harrison <Jim@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Nope; that's not true, either. I was just being facetious. I have been inspired by: http://www.tacteam.net/openport.htm SMTP Server Publishing gives you the SMTP Filter and (with ISA 2000 & 2004), the Message Screecher.] For this requirement I just need an SMTP NAT and source IP packet filtering so that I can specify the two Internet subnets that are permitted through. This is far more capable than the "zealot technique". It's packet filters that are for the "openaport" fuuls and they only apply to services operating on the ISA itself. Is this an SBS deployment? Not in the Microsoft SBS software sense, but maybe in employee count. There is a dedicated ISA server and dedicated Exchange server. The change is that email protection has been outsourced to Postini and I need to deny anonymous SMTP connections from the rest of the Internet. ...D From: isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ] On Behalf Of Danny Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 8:24 AM To: isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [isalist] Re: Limit SMTP connections from several subnets in ISA 2000 Actually Mr. Teacher, can I have that back. I want to say, at the end of the day, it is the packet filters. :) Server Publishing rules in ISA 2000 are just for all of the "hardware firewall" zealots. However, in appears as though I can only specify one source subnet per packet filter. ...D On 1/5/07, Danny <nocmonkey@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: Server publishing, I believe, but ISA 2000 is like MS02 security bulletins to me. Thanks, ...D On 1/3/07, Jim Harrison < Jim@xxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:Jim@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <mailto:Jim@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: How is the SMTP service made public; server publishing rules or packet filters? From: isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <mailto:isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [mailto: isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ] On Behalf Of Danny Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 8:17 AM To: isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [isalist] Limit SMTP connections from several subnets in ISA 2000 Been awhile since I used ISA 2000... what is the best way to restrict SMTP connections from several specific Internet IP subnets? Thanks. All mail to and from this domain is GFI-scanned. All mail to and from this domain is GFI-scanned. All mail to and from this domain is GFI-scanned.