[isalist] Re: Idiot ISA Comment of the Year

  • From: "Jim Harrison" <Jim@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 17:32:09 -0700

http://www.ISAserver.org
-------------------------------------------------------

Careful; logic dictates that this statement actually justifies reentering the 
SBS effort.


-------------------------------------------------------
   Jim Harrison
   MCP(NT4, W2K), A+, Network+, PCG
   http://isaserver.org/Jim_Harrison/
   http://isatools.org
   Read the help / books / articles!
-------------------------------------------------------
 

-----Original Message-----
From: isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Thomas W Shinder
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 17:09
To: isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [isalist] Re: Idiot ISA Comment of the Year

Evil can only win when good men fail to fight for right.
 
Thomas W Shinder, M.D.
Site: www.isaserver.org <http://www.isaserver.org/>
Blog: http://blogs.isaserver.org/shinder/
Book: http://tinyurl.com/3xqb7 <http://tinyurl.com/3xqb7> MVP -- ISA Firewalls

 


________________________________

        From: isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Greg Mulholland
        Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 6:53 PM
        To: isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
        Subject: [isalist] Re: Idiot ISA Comment of the Year
        
        
        I gave up arguing..if it makes them feel more comfortable then, good 
for them!
         
        Greg

                ----- Original Message ----- 
                From: Thomas W Shinder <mailto:tshinder@xxxxxxxxxxx>  
                To: isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
                Sent: Friday, August 18, 2006 9:59 AM
                Subject: [isalist] Idiot ISA Comment of the Year


                "Although my preference is to install ISA Server 2004 in a 
workgroup, especially when it's protecting the edge of the network, if you need 
domain membership for ISA Server 2004, consider installing it in a separate 
forest. For example, if you are running ISA Server 2004 in a DMZ, install it in 
a separate forest and then create a one-way trust between your internal forest 
and your ISA Server 2004 forest."

                
http://www.certcities.com/editorial/columns/story.asp?EditorialsID=207

                I hate when these guys stick their collective thumbs up their 
a**es with this kind of idiot advice. Just what type of "protection" to they 
think they're going to stick by putting a PIX in front of the ISA firewall in 
this scenario? Like a friggin bullet fired in in certain establishments, this 
misconception continues to ricochet throughout the clueless without burying 
itself in the right target. ACK.

                If you don't understand why this is one of the most moronic 
statements you can make about the ISA firewall, stay tuned to my blog for 
"Attack of Truth" :)

                And to think guys like this are poisoning the minds of poor 
fledgling ISA admins who are trying to get their MCP in ISA :(
                Thomas W Shinder, M.D.
                Site: www.isaserver.org <http://www.isaserver.org/> 
                Blog: http://blogs.isaserver.org/shinder/
                Book: http://tinyurl.com/3xqb7 <http://tinyurl.com/3xqb7> 
                MVP -- ISA Firewalls

                 


All mail to and from this domain is GFI-scanned.

------------------------------------------------------
List Archives: //www.freelists.org/archives/isalist/
ISA Server Newsletter: http://www.isaserver.org/pages/newsletter.asp
ISA Server Articles and Tutorials: http://www.isaserver.org/articles_tutorials/
ISA Server Blogs: http://blogs.isaserver.org/
------------------------------------------------------
Visit TechGenix.com for more information about our other sites:
http://www.techgenix.com
------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe visit http://www.isaserver.org/pages/isalist.asp
Report abuse to listadmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Other related posts: