RE: ISA 2004 Cache

  • From: <AHendriks@xxxxxx>
  • To: <isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 15:14:50 +0200

> This is getting absurd.
> 
> The original problem was about people getting content from 
> one EXTERNAL site when they had actually requested a 
> completely different EXTERNAL site.

That's still the problem.

> In order for ISA to provide ANY content, it must first 
> perform name lookups for the site being requested (www.google.com).
> 
> In order for this to occur, it must contact a DNS server that 
> can either provide this name-to-IP mapping or it also must 
> contact a DNS server that can.
> 
> This cannot happen while "port 53 is blocked".

Nope, the isa server in the dmz zone can make dns request to a internal
dns server which have acces through that port to the internet, the isa
server can't connect to a dns server on the internet only to the dns in
the internal lan.


> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: AHendriks@xxxxxx [mailto:AHendriks@xxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005 11:12 PM
> To: [ISAserver.org Discussion List]
> Subject: [isalist] RE: ISA 2004 Cache
> 
> http://www.ISAserver.org
> 
> 
> > You can't have both "resolving sites well" and "port blocked" 
> > in the same environment.
> 
> I can resolve the site with the dns which is hosted insite, 
> and the blocked port is the port to the internet, only port 
> 80 and 21 are opend to the internet, port 53 can go to the 
> internet dns server.
> 
> Arjan
> > 
> > > Sounds like you might be getting some DNS cache poisoning.
> > > This can completely mess up the ISA cache because ISA gets
> > directed to
> > > the wrong place.
> > 
> > That was my first thought to, but i have checked dns 
> settings serveral 
> > times, and the dns is resolving the sites well.
> > 
> > > Try using a different upstream DNS provider and see if that helps.
> > 
> > I have only one dns upstream available, which is a internal dns 
> > server, i'm unable to change the dns to a server on the internet, 
> > cause the port has been blocked.
> > 
> > Arjan
> > 
> > > 
> > > > You'll have to be a bit more specific about:
> > > 
> > > OK, i will place some configuration stuff here.
> > > 
> > > > 1. your ISA caching configuration
> > > 
> > > The default cache rule, the only thing i have changed is
> > disabling the
> > > ftp caching, an second rule which disables caching for 
> > > windowsupdate.microsoft.com.
> > > 
> > > I have configured a cache size of 10 Gb, and have left
> > everything in
> > > default.
> > > 
> > > > 2. what sites
> > > 
> > > When going to www.google.com the user ends up at www.omroep.nl
> > > 
> > > > 3. what requests.
> > > 
> > > HTTP request.
> > > 
> > > > Generally, ISA caches site content according to the rule
> > > outlined in
> > > > the ISA help, but it's also possible to configure it so
> > > that it caches
> > > 
> > > > everything in sight (bad thing).
> > > 
> > > I haven't changed anything in the caching rule, as
> > mentioned above, on
> > > the server there is a eTrust antivirus client active, i
> > have excluded
> > > the caching dir for scanning, and the processes used by isa are 
> > > excluded to.


************************************************************************
De informatie in deze e-mail is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Als 
u deze e-mail onterecht heeft ontvangen, wilt u dan zo vriendelijk zijn de 
afzender te waarschuwen door deze e-mail terug te sturen en de gegevens van uw 
computer te verwijderen. De RDW kan niet volledig instaan voor de juiste en 
volledige overbrenging van deze e-mail.

The information in this e-mail is exclusively intended for the addressee. If 
you have received this e-mail in error, then you are requested to inform the 
sender by returning this e-mail to him/her and delete the message. The RDW has 
not secured the contents of this e-mail and can therefore not guarantee the 
accurate and complete transmission of this e-mail.
************************************************************************




Other related posts: