RE: DMZ Query
- From: "Stefaan Pouseele" <stefaan.pouseele@xxxxxxx>
- To: "'[ISAserver.org Discussion List]'" <isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 23:32:11 +0100
Hi Simon,
check out:
- http://www.isaserver.org/shinder/tutorials/dmz_scenarios.htm
-
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=%2Fservicedesks%2Fwebcasts%2F
wc110801%2Fwcblurb110801%2Easp
In short: in a tri-homed DMZ scenario, ISA is just doing routing and packet
filtering between Extenal and DMZ. This is by design. If you want better
control use a back-to-back DMZ scenario.
Hope this helps,
Stefaan
-----Original Message-----
From: simon_keli@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:simon_keli@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: zaterdag 23 februari 2002 22:44
To: [ISAserver.org Discussion List]
Subject: [isalist] DMZ Query
http://www.ISAserver.org
Please can someone tell me why NAT is necessary for the internal network
and not for the DMZ zone? And, why it is safe to use public IP addresses
for servers on the DMZ and not on the internal network?
Many thanks,
Simon
------------------------------------------------------
You are currently subscribed to this ISAserver.org Discussion List as:
stefaan.pouseele@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send a blank email to $subst('Email.Unsub')
Other related posts:
