[infoshare] Fwd: Ricky Enger on the Kindle

  • From: Ellen Rubin <ellenr5@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: infoshare@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2011 22:31:37 -0400

One more chapter in the Kindle inacessibility!
Ellen



From: "Bob Acosta" <boacosta@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2011 18:13:10 -0700
Subject: [bardtalk] Ricky Enger on the Kindle
X-Antivirus: AVG for E-mail 9.0.914 [271.1.1/3943]
X-Antispam: NO; Spamcatcher 6.1.2. Score 1



    Hi you all.  I don?t know if I spelled her name right but I thought she wrote a very good article expressing the current state of amazon?s stance on accessibility.  Nan, I don?t believe that holding these views and desires makes me a ?disgruntled? blind person.<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />

 

October 4, 2011  by  renger

Kindle Fire: Down in Flames

By Ricky Enger

With Contributions from SeroTalk Staff

The SeroTalk team had a recorded discussion about our thoughts on Amazon and its newest Kindle  devices. This post is not an exact transcript of that session, but it is an attempt to collect the  views expressed in that conversation and capture them in written form. There are points covered in  that discussion that aren?t covered here and vice versa, so if you like, you can  listen to the audio  in addition to reading this post.

It was just over a year ago when we posted an  accessibility review of the Amazon Kindle 3.  The accessibility features on the unit were added primarily as a result of  legal action  by the  NFB  and  ACB  against  Arizona State University , who used the  Kindle DX  in a pilot project to test the viability of ebook readers in the classroom. While we weren?t happy  that it required legal action for Amazon to sit up and take notice of the importance of  accessibility, we were excited that Amazon had at least taken a step in the right direction.. Our  review concluded that the Kindle 3 was certainly usable as a reading device, but still needed some  work in order to be considered a viable solution for students and professionals. In the review, we  gave specific issues for Amazon to improve upon to make the unit truly accessible. At that time, we  had very high hopes. We encouraged the community to applaud Amazon?s accessibility efforts and to   support the initiative through any means possible, including purchasing Kindle units and providing  constructive feedback to the design team. We were optimistic that by showing our appreciation for  Amazon?s efforts and giving useful advice regarding enhancements,we were taking the first step  toward a bright, shiny, accessible future. It?s a year later, so where are we now? What  improvements has Amazon made to further its initial attempt at accessibility?

A rundown of the New Kindle Devices

On September 28, Amazon announced 4 basic Kindle devices. There are a few different configurations  for each device, such as 3g, ad-supported and so on, but we?ll concentrate on the base models. The  first model, simply called  The Kindle,  retails for $79, and the unit appears to have no accessibility features. With that said, there is  no speaker on the unit so implementing text-to-speech would be impossible. The next device, the $99  Kindle Touch , does have read-aloud capability but there is no mention of the voice guide system which makes  navigating menus on the device possible for a blind person. Still, it may be usable by those with  other print disabilities. The  Kindle Keyboard,  also $99, is a rebranded version of the Kindle 3. To our knowledge, there have been no  accessibility improvements on this unit. Last, there is the  Kindle Fire.  This is an Android-based tablet device retailing for $199. Though no one will have hands-on  experience with the unit until its release on November 21, there has been no mention of  accessibility on the unit so it?s pretty safe to assume there is none. This is despite the fact  that the Android platform does have some accessibility, and a large number of blind people  use it productively on mobile devices.

Discontent with Content

For some of us, being denied the opportunity to use the Kindle hardware is a big disappointment. We  like the process of getting a brand-new gadget in hand and exploring its capabilities. However, it  seems that for the majority of us, the content is what we truly care about. We want the chance to  buy an ebook the day of its release, and read it accessibly on the device of our choosing. We want  the ability to make notes on a passage in a book and later review those notes while studying for an  exam. And it?s not just about books. Amazon offers its Prime members access to streaming music,  movies and television shows on demand, and this service is growing at an impressive rate. So what?s  the problem? Not only is the content unavailable to a blind person on the Kindle Fire, but it it  can?t be consumed accessibly on any device. Amazon made a  patronizing attempt at accessibility  for Kindle books on the PC by providing a piece of software with read-aloud capability. However,  it failed to take in to account that blind and print-disabled people already have assistive  technology which does far more than reading a book aloud. No consideration was given to the  deaf/blind population and the need to use Braille to access material. No consideration was given to  the student who needs to be able to review the spelling of complex words or proper names, neither  of which can be done by simply listening to the words spoken aloud. And when it comes to other  content, no consideration was given to the thousands of blind Amazon prime members who want to be  able to enjoy streaming music and video on demand, just like everyone else.

The ?Why?? of Accessibility

We believe that sometimes businesses don?t build  accessibility in to their products for the simple  reason that they don?t know how to do so. With these businesses, all they need is to be educated  about what accessibility means, and  to be given some guidance on how to implement it. With Amazon,  the decision not to implement accessibility has absolutely nothing to do with a lack of  information. The company has consistently received feedback from blind users about what could be  improved on their reading devices to make them fully accessible. They have received feedback from  iOS users requesting that the Kindle app be made accessible, and Apple provides very detailed  development guidelines  and information on how this can be accomplished. They have received feedback from users who want  accessible content on their Android devices, and while the  guidelines for accessibility  on this platform aren?t as straightforward, they do still exist. They have received feedback about  the inability to use their streaming video services or cloud player with a screen reader, along  with pointers on how to make the services more accessible.

Still, though they have been made aware of the problem and they have access to the tools needed to  solve it, they have not taken any steps to do so. Ok, that?s not entirely accurate. Amazon has made  a small  stab  at becoming more accessibility-minded. The company posted a  job opening for a program manager  with experience in accessibility. Nice move, or at least it would?ve been a year ago when the new  product designs were just getting under way. Instead, the job was posted just 6 days before the  release of the new devices. Was the decision to advertise for the position made because of a  genuine concern about accessibility? We doubt it. We think it?s far more likely that Amazon didn?t  want to be called on the carpet publicly for its behavior, and so decided to make a preemptive move  to try and convince the gullible among us that it truly has our interests at heart. If Amazon cared  a thing about accessibility, the company would understand the importance of incorporating it from  the ground up, not bolting on half-baked solutions after the fact in order to appease the legal  beagles.

And why should Amazon care about accessibility? Is it because it?s the right thing to do? Is it  because blind and print-disabled people deserve access, just like everyone else? Is it because  universal accessibility ultimately benefits everyone? Sorry, but no. All those things are true, of  course, but they aren?t compelling reasons for Amazon. While individuals who work for the company  may be empathetic, the corporation itself is an unfeeling entity whose primary goal is to make  money. Anything that furthers that goal is good, and anything which appears to take time and energy  away from that pursuit is considered a bad thing. From Amazon?s perspective, the blind community is  not seen as a significant market share. At best, we?re considered a time-consuming and expensive  legal liability. This has to change. Until it does, lawsuits will continue to be filed against  Amazon, and the corporation will continue to do the bare minimum to settle the dispute and satisfy  the legal requirements. That, in our minds, is not progress.

The Bottom Line

That?s what it?s all about ? the bottom line. Amazon can safely continue to ignore us, unless the  company sees a direct effect on revenue that can clearly be traced to its failure to implement  accessibility. So how do we make that happen? The first step is to stop believing those who make  statements like: ?only legal action can solve this problem.? Or how about this one? ?The blind  community isn?t big enough, or significant enough to matter.? Where has this attitude come from  anyway, considering that there are an estimated 180 million legally blind people worldwide, 35  million of whom are totally blind? Granted, all these people don?t have Amazon but a significant  percentage of them do. Why have we become convinced that we are a tiny population who cannot effect  change? It just isn?t true. Let?s not make the mistake of thinking that the blind community is only  as large as the number of people who follow us on social networking sites. Let?s not make the  mistake of believing that accessibility is only a blindness-related concern, and that no one else  is affected. And let?s not assume just because we advocated for accessibility and were rejected by  an unfeeling corporate entity, that the same thing will happen when we bring our cause to  empathetic individuals. Corporations may not care, but people do. And they don?t have to be members  of the blind community to understand the situation. Amazon can safely ignore one, or two, or three  customers who boycott their services, but what happens when thousands, or millions  do? You may be  only one person, but you?re a person with a voice. So how can you use it? Here are just a few  suggestions, and we would welcome yours as well.

You can read the  blog describing the concept of the Kindle fire sale , and  visit the web site  later created for the purpose of organizing it. You can approach your local newspaper and let the  public know how Amazon?s business decisions affect an entire community of paying consumers. You can  cancel your Amazon prime membership, citing lack of accessibility as your reason. You can approach  content creators and explain that you can?t make use of their content when it is provided through  Amazon. You can approach your school system or university and explain how Amazon?s lack of  accessibility continues to affect disabled students. You can contact your favorite tech enthusiasts  like members of the  TWiT Network,  CNET Podcast Network,  or  In To Tomorrow  just to name a few, and broadcast your views on mainstream podcasts. You can share this post, and  others like it, with people who will make a business case for accessibility right alongside you.  You can share your comments on this blog so that anyone who reads it, including Amazon themselves,  will understand that it isn?t just a small group of people who care about the issue.  Oh, and let?s  not forget, you can contact Amazon directly. You can do so by phone at (800) 201-7575, or by email  at  kindle-feedback@xxxxxxxxxx

Or, you can always sit back and wait for someone else to make your world accessible, in which case  you?ll be waiting a very long time. In the initial Kindle review, we closed with a statement that  is still particularly apt. Don?t just wait for accessibility to happen. Be an active participant in  making it happen.

 

 
 
 
Robert Acosta, President
Helping Hands for the Blind
Email: boacosta@xxxxxxxxxxx
Web Site: www.helpinghands4theblind.org
 
You can assist Helping Hands for the Blind by donating your used computers to us. If you have a blind friend in need of a computer, please mail us at the above address.


__._,_.___


Visit: http://www.bardtalk.com to find quick answers to frequently asked
questions.

Follow other useful links concerning digital audio players such as the
Victor Reader Stream and GWMicro BookSense, or find helpful links to other
support lists.




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

Other related posts: