[Ilugc] spamassassin hits

  • From: lawgon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Kenneth Gonsalves)
  • Date: Wed Aug 11 17:44:22 2010

On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 17:35 +0530, Girish Venkatachalam wrote:

On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves
<lawgon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
hi,

after some years of experimentation, I find a setting of 3.5 on
spamassassin along with some training eliminates 99% of spam - and
very
rarely catches non spam.

Unfortunately a lot of people use spamassassin.

The issue is with false positives and slowness.

I have never used it but. 

then how do you know about false positives and slowness?
-- 
regards
KG
http://lawgon.livejournal.com

Other related posts: