[Ilugc] Language metrics (Was Re: .a-tip-a-day patch etc.)

  • From: rmathews@xxxxxxxxx (Roshan Mathews)
  • Date: Wed Sep 30 22:27:10 2009

On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Kapil Hari Paranjape
<kapil@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Since naming specific languages seems to activate the sensitive
spots, I will restrict myself to "abstract nonsense" here.

Oh, please be specific.  Trying to be PC means you don't get much done
anyways.   The ultra-sensitivity here is major annoying already.  I'd
rather the focus on ILUGC remained on what you have to say instead of
how you say it.

On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Rahul Sundaram
<sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
6. Community
7. Ability to hire skilled programmers in that language
8. Availability of mature libraries for the purposes

These would fall into Category 1, on Kapil's list.

Roshan Mathews

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. ilugc
  3. Archive
  4. 09-2009