[Ilugc] Co-ordinator for Ilugc
- From: madanus@xxxxxxxxx (Madan U Sreenivasan)
- Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 09:26:32 +0530
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Manokaran K <manokaran at gmail.com> wrote:
I feel the list members need not be included. The election exercise should
be restricted to those who physically attend the LUG events.
+100
Not only electing the coordinator - Any official activities should be
handled only by people who are actively involved, and a discussion should
ensue in person. Anybody using the ILUGC name should take permission from
this core group. The names in this group might vary over time, but there
should be a core group made of people who show positive interest.
Am really wondering if this list has lost its relevance. We are not
pursuing technical discussions of the latest technologies - instead we
spend more time worrying about who is facilitating the meetings. If we
split this list into administrative and technical, there would be more
administrative mails than technical ones.
Maybe more young blood is required.
Regards,
Madan
Other related posts:
