[ibis-quality] updated parser bug priority list
- From: "Mike LaBonte (milabont)" <milabont@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <ibis-quality@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:23:45 -0500
Here is the list of parser bug candidates in order of priority, based on
our votes - including Kim. The score is based on a Borda summation of
the individual votes, where P1 gets 3 points, P2 gets 2 points, and P3
gets 1 point:
CHECK SCORE DESC
4.2.3 14 {LEVEL 1} [Model] Vinl and Vinh enclose Vmeas
2.2 12 {LEVEL 0} Latest [IBIS ver] used
3.1.2 12 {LEVEL 0} [Package] Parasitics must be reasonable
4.3.2 12 {LEVEL 1} I-V tables have correct typ/min/max order
3.2.4 11 {OPTIONAL} [Pin] RLC complete
4.1.3 11 {LEVEL 0} [Model] C_comp is reasonable
4.2.13 11 {LEVEL 1} [Model Spec] S_Overshoot subparameters
complete
4.3.10 11 {LEVEL 1} [Pulldown] I-V tables pass through zero/zero
4.3.11 11 {LEVEL 1} [Pullup] I-V tables pass through zero/zero
4.1.4 9 {LEVEL 1} [Model] C_comp is correct
4.2.7 9 {LEVEL 0} [Model Spec] Vinl+/Vinh+ greater than
Vinl-/Vinh-
4.2.8 9 {LEVEL 1} [Model Spec] Vinl+/- and Vinh+/- enclose
Vmeas
4.3.4 9 {LEVEL 1} [Pullup] voltage sweep range is correct
3.3.2 8 {LEVEL 0} [Diff Pin] Vdiff and Tskew complete and
reasonable
4.2.15 8 {LEVEL 1} [Model Spec] S_Overshoot subparameters track
typ/min/max
4.3.5 8 {LEVEL 1} [Pulldown] voltage sweep range is correct
2.3 6 {LEVEL 0} Do not use [Comment Char]
4.2.12 6 {LEVEL 1} [Model Spec] Pulse_time reasonable
4.3.6 6 {LEVEL 1} [Power Clamp] voltage sweep range is correct
4.3.7 6 {LEVEL 1} [GND Clamp] voltage sweep range is correct
Mike
Other related posts:
- » [ibis-quality] updated parser bug priority list
