All,
Clarifying what "Aggressor" means
When there is a model with multiple I/O pin names, it is coupled, all I/O
signals are victims and aggressors. However, unless one is building a
model will all of the I/O signals in the package, there will be some I/O
signals that have all of their aggressors and there will be some I/O
signals that do not have all of their aggressors.
Is there not a requirement that when we have a coupled model, we have some
indication which I/O have all of their aggressors and which I/O do not
have all of their aggressors. I chose to add to a terminal the field
"Aggressors" to indicate that this terminal can only be used as an
Aggressor, and if using that terminal as a victim it would not have all of
its aggressors in the model.
New Rules
. Two rows in the [Pin] section cannot have the same pin_name
. If two pins have the same signal_name, they must have the same
model_name.
. If two pins have the same bus_label, they must have the same
signal_name.
. Signal_name is the default bus_label for all POWER and GND
pins.
. Pins that are POWER, GND or NC are not required entries in the
[Pin Mapping] section.
Walter
Walter Katz
<mailto:wkatz@xxxxxxxxxx> wkatz@xxxxxxxxxx
Phone 303.449-2308
Mobile 303.335-6156
