[ibis-editorial] Re: Issue on IBIS 5.1 AMI_Version type
- From: "Muranyi, Arpad" <Arpad_Muranyi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "ibis-editorial@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <ibis-editorial@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 19:18:38 +0000
Sounds OK, as long as we don't do sub-decimals,
and or alphabetic characters, like 5.1a...
Good catch, Radek!
Arpad
================================================
From: ibis-editorial-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ibis-editorial-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mirmak, Michael
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 2:09 PM
To: ibis-editorial@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ibis-editorial] Issue on IBIS 5.1 AMI_Version type
Thanks to Radek Biernacki for spotting this: AMI_Version is defined as Type
String, but we require that it accept values of "5.1" or greater. "Greater" is
meaningless if this is a string, so this is unenforceable.
I would recommend changing this to Float, assuming that we will not be defining
sub-decimal version numbers (5.1.2, for example).
Comments? Objections? This will be raised at tomorrow's Open Forum
teleconference.
- MM
Other related posts:
