[ibis-editorial] Re: Figure 38 has both arrows... and is accurate to the original source
- From: "Bob Ross" <bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <ibis-editorial@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 11:16:01 -0800
Michael and Arpad
The arrows correspond to the transistor terminals before the
circle was added and not to any direction flows.
So these should be just terminals without reference to NMOS or PMOS
or generically the practical case of parallel NMOS and PMOS configurations.
The current flow arrow defines the sign convention for all cases.
Bob
From: ibis-editorial-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ibis-editorial-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Muranyi, Arpad
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 10:49 AM
To: ibis-editorial@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ibis-editorial] Re: Figure 38 has both arrows... and is accurate
to the original source
Did we mean to say that the current is positive
when it goes out of that node on either side?
Thanks,
Arpad
================================================
From: ibis-editorial-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ibis-editorial-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mirmak, Michael
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 12:41 PM
To: ibis-editorial@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ibis-editorial] Figure 38 has both arrows... and is accurate to
the original source
In a previous meeting, we noted that the Series MOSFET extraction diagram,
Figure 38 in the current drafts, shows two different arrows pointing in
opposite directions (one at the source and one at the drain).
Unfortunately, the original IBIS 5.0 document, on page 179 of Section 9,
contains an ASCII drawing for this same structure with two arrows pointing
in opposite directions.
What *should* this diagram show?
- MM
Other related posts:
