Dear Jeab, As I understand. If triggers are inserted, then i3 network should be reachable. After that, if HITs are the same to the default ones then the triggers should have exactly these names in i3 network. After that only i3 network is used, with those existing i3 triggers, then it should be ok. Actually, you won't see the i3 messages with "tcpdump -n -i any esp or proto 253 or port 50500", you should check the log on the receiver side to check if i3 message was sent there. By the way in i3 you do not need to do "hipconf add map 2001:1d:39a5:6add:3291:c582:c4a6:250a 3ffe::3". Try also without it. PS: I could replay such kind of problem when I send the I1 packet before the trigger on responder side, or initiator side is not inserted. Please, reply the problem and send me the whole hipd logs of both machines. Sincerely, Andrey Lukyanenko. On Jan 18, 2008 9:24 AM, Jeab <aboutjeab@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Dear Andrey Lukyanenko, > > Thank you for your reply. > > I got the default HIT of both hosts exactly as the HIT I used for testing. > > > > Initiator 3ffe::1> HIT 2001:001c:5275:052e:02a2:60dc:3874:e11c > > > Responder 3ffe::3> HIT 2001:001d:39a5:6add:3291:c582:c4a6:250a > > As no HIP traffic generated at the initiator side, could it be possible that > it is involved with routing problem? > I attached here my tested environment just in case :) > > Best Regards, jeab > > > > > Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:27:24 +0200 > > From: laser.ru@xxxxxxxxx > > To: hipl-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: [hipl-users] Re: Hi3 No matching trigger > > > > > Hello Jeab, > > > > Please run 'tools/hipconf get hi default' on both machines and tell me > > the result. > > > > BR, > > Andrey Lukyanenko. > > > ________________________________ > Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! MSN Messenger >