Axel said: >I think it's a good idea to keep the OpenTracker somewhat independent >from the OpenBeOS source tree - although I see that it is very tightly >integrated into the system, and libtracker.so is a part of BeOS. >I would just import OT into the sources, but only to let stuff compile >- much like many other third party applications. It would not be >allowed to do any changes to that code - those changes should go into >the main OT repository which could be later on reimported in OpenBeOS >(for API changes or whatever, it doesn't have to be the latest >version). > >Unlike OpenBeOS OT is a stable product which will be continuously >updated - and this should (at least in theory :-) happen much more >often as OS releases. Maybe, maybe not. :-) It all depends on what sort of a release schedule we all decide on. We could certainly be like the BSD folks, with their stable trees. >Some day later, if OpenBeOS is the one and only out there, and has a >stable base, we might reconsider it, though. So, in other words, soon...