[openbeos] Re: Open-beos-cvs digest, Vol 1 #1587 - 8 msgs
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Open BeOS" <openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 02:03:03 +0200 CEST
Hi,
Bill Hayden just did the following to Shape.cpp:
> Log Message:
> Conform to new scoping rules for variables defined in a for loop
> status_t err = BArchivable::Archive(archive, deep);
> + int32 i;
> @@ -186,7 +187,7 @@
> - for (int32 i = 1; i < data->ptCount; i++)
> + for (i = 1; i < data->ptCount; i++)
> archive->AddPoint("pts", data->ptList[i]);
Have I missed the evolution? What new scoping rules? Did M$ win? I
always hated VC++ for that...
Adios...
Axel.
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] Re: Open-beos-cvs digest, Vol 1 #1587 - 8 msgs
- » [openbeos] Re: Open-beos-cvs digest, Vol 1 #1587 - 8 msgs
- » [openbeos] Re: Open-beos-cvs digest, Vol 1 #1587 - 8 msgs
- » [openbeos] Re: Open-beos-cvs digest, Vol 1 #1587 - 8 msgs
- » [openbeos] Re: Open-beos-cvs digest, Vol 1 #1587 - 8 msgs
- » [openbeos] Re: Open-beos-cvs digest, Vol 1 #1587 - 8 msgs
- » [openbeos] Re: Open-beos-cvs digest, Vol 1 #1587 - 8 msgs
- » [openbeos] Re: Open-beos-cvs digest, Vol 1 #1587 - 8 msgs
- » [openbeos] Re: Open-beos-cvs digest, Vol 1 #1587 - 8 msgs
- » [openbeos] Re: Open-beos-cvs digest, Vol 1 #1587 - 8 msgs
- » [openbeos] Re: Open-beos-cvs digest, Vol 1 #1587 - 8 msgs
- » [openbeos] Re: Open-beos-cvs digest, Vol 1 #1587 - 8 msgs
- » [openbeos] Re: Open-beos-cvs digest, Vol 1 #1587 - 8 msgs
- » [openbeos] Re: Open-beos-cvs digest, Vol 1 #1587 - 8 msgs
- » [openbeos] Re: Open-beos-cvs digest, Vol 1 #1587 - 8 msgs