On 2007-04-12 at 09:51:25 [+0200], Axel Dörfler <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Ingo Weinhold <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 2007-04-12 at 03:06:03 [+0200], Gustavo grieco > > <gustavo.grieco@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > ¿Why no realtime scheduling? I heard that its dificult to implement > > > (preemption), but can be focus in Desktop use. > > Low latencies are certainly beneficial, particularly for media > > applications, but IMHO real-time capabilities (e.g. guaranteed > > latencies) > > are not really necessary. At least I've found a problem with how BeOS > > worked in this respect. Er, that is to read "... I haven't found a problem ...". > Since when does BeOS guarantee you anything? :-) It doesn't. Besides the file system getting awfully fragmented after a time and stuff like that. ;-) CU, Ingo