[openbeos] Re: Booting Haiku
- From: Oliver Tappe <openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 21:26:30 +0200
On 2005-05-02 at 18:12:10 [+0200], Axel Dörfler wrote:
> Philip Harrison <haikutime@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[ 8< ]
> > > What compiler did you use?
> > Oliver Tappe's gcc-2.95.3-beos-041025
> > Should I be using Oliver Tappe's gcc-3.4.3?
> > ld and jam off the haiku website.
>
> You don't need to update "ld" when you're using GCC 2.95.3. The rest
> looks good, I think :)
> And yes, Oliver's compiler is the recommended one - other compilers might
> not be able to compile our tree correctly.
Just to get things clear (and avoid misunderstandings):
- I have only worked on one compiler, gcc-2.95.3.
- gcc-3.4.3 was done by Marcin Konicki, it's just hosted on "my"
gcc-page over at BeBits.
- I suggest you use gcc-2.95.3 when compiling haiku (at least
that's
what should work and give you binary compatibility with R5).
cheers,
Oliver
- References:
- [openbeos] Re: Booting Haiku
- From: Axel Dörfler
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] Booting Haiku
- » [openbeos] Re: Booting Haiku
- » [openbeos] Re: Booting Haiku
- » [openbeos] Re: Booting Haiku
- » [openbeos] Re: Booting Haiku
- » [openbeos] Re: Booting Haiku
- » [openbeos] Re: Booting Haiku
- » [openbeos] Re: Booting Haiku
- » [openbeos] Re: Booting Haiku
- » [openbeos] Re: Booting Haiku
- » [openbeos] Re: Booting Haiku
- [openbeos] Re: Booting Haiku
- From: Axel Dörfler