Hello everyone, On 12 August 2014 22:09, Arvind S Raj <sraj.arvind@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 12 August 2014 20:03, pulkomandy <pulkomandy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Either way is fine. Maybe the bootloader should setup a zeroed frame in >> the kernel stack so the kernel stops there and doesn't try to analyze >> bootloader functions? > > Setting up a zeroed frame sounds like a good idea. I'll work along those > lines. I found another possible solution - ensure that the return address of the stack frame is within the area allocated for the kernel. This works fine here and I've uploaded the patch in ticket #11131.