[haiku-development] Re: wchar redundant redeclaration
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: haiku-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 09:43:58 +0100
Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2009-11-09 at 01:47:24 [+0100], scott mc <scottmc2@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > I just ran into this warning:
> > /boot/develop/headers/posix/wchar.h:117: warning: redundant
> > redeclaration of `wcstoul' in same scope
> > /boot/develop/headers/posix/wchar.h:115: warning: previous
> > declaration
> > of `wcstoul'
> > And looking at wchar.h I see this:
> >
> > 115: extern unsigned long wcstoul(const wchar_t *, wchar_t
> > **, int);
> > 116: extern unsigned long long wcstoull(const wchar_t *, wchar_t
> > **,
> > int);
> > 117: extern unsigned long int wcstoul(const wchar_t *, wchar_t
> > **, int);
> >
> > question is, which one is right and which is wrong? Or is it
> > intended
> > to have unsigned long and unsigned long int?
> > I'm assuming 117 is the wrong one
> Since "long == long int" both are semantically equivalent. Either one
> can be
> removed, ideally such that the prototype matches the implementation.
> A quick
> grep in the libroot sources doesn't immediately turn up which one
> that would
> be though (isn't glibc lovely?), so a closer inspection would be
> required.
I just went with what POSIX asks for in r33957.
Bye,
Axel.
Other related posts:
