On 2011-02-26 at 13:25:13 [+0100], Truls Becken <truls.becken@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 19:03, Oliver Tappe wrote: > > > To bring this off-topic discussion back to the original point: > > > > it would more likely be /boot/home/config/packages/contents/bin > > What will be the standard base directories when switching to package-fs? > Will it be: > > /boot/system > /boot/common/packages/contents > /boot/common > /boot/home/config/packages/contents > /boot/home/config > > Or just: > > /boot/system > /boot/common/packages/contents > /boot/home/config/packages/contents If 'standard base directories' refers to folders containing 'add-ons', ,'apps', 'bin', ... subfolders, then it'll be this: /boot/system/packages/contents /boot/common/packages/contents /boot/home/config/packages/contents > If the latter, what directories are left in /boot/home/config? Just > packages and settings? In /boot/home/config there is 'be', 'boot', 'cache', 'packages' and 'settings' > If this is what we end up with, perhaps moving > them up to /boot/home would not be so bad after all? > > But perhaps all five directories will be used so that users have the > choice of using packages or organizing things by hand, e.g. for > applications in development? Yep, I think that makes most sense in /boot/home/config, for development and for installing old apps and/or add-ons (the ones that aren't available as hpkg). cheers, Oliver