[haiku-development] Re: Vote on commit access for Jonathan Schiefer
- From: Alexander von Gluck IV <kallisti5@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Sean Collins <smc.collins@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 21:30:20 -0600
On Dec 16, 2013 7:42 PM, Sean Collins <smc.collins@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Matt Madia wrote:
> > On 12/16/13, Sean Collins <smc.collins@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> I don't have a vote here but I figured someone may as well kick start
> >> the nomination process, all much of his work has been discussed and
> >> followed on the commit mailing list for over a year.
> >>
> >
> > To be strictly pedantic, only committers (or other contributors who
> > have a vote) can start a vote.
> >
> > --mmadia
> >
> >
> >
> Then kick it off, this is a call to action, inaction gets the exact same
> result, every time, inaction.
>
Found his github. Total of three commits with extremely incorrect style 11
months ago.
Github.com/midar/haiku
I think we need better examples before a vote is triggered. Most current
commiters followed the make bugs in trac, patch bugs in trac process.
The haiku code style guidelines are extremely tight, I'd rather see some basic
understanding of them before starting a vote. (Any new commiter making a large
number of errors will cause trigger a lot of frustration for the development
community and the commiter)
Other related posts:
