Why libbind don't have a gcc4 version? Atenciosamente, Michael Vinícius de Oliveira ----- Mensagem original ---- De: Axel Dörfler <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Para: haiku-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Enviadas: Quarta-feira, 11 de Novembro de 2009 6:20:46 Assunto: [haiku-development] Re: Proposal: {dns,name,resolver}_server Alexander Botero-Lowry <alex.boterolowry@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > So I'm proposing, and if there isn't massive objection, intending to > implement a > _very_ basic forwarding dns server that will be used libbind for all > DNS requests. > This server will accept messages for introspecting and setting DNS > settings, so > that the network preflet can just send a message to update DNS > settings instead > of writing resolv.conf. Something like this (for caching, mostly, but also for things like Bonjour/ZeroConf) is already the plan. However, it should be made part of the net_server, and not be an extra server. > Advanced features that I currently use dnsmasq to do would be > forthcoming: > > 1) ability to mark a domain as bogus (so if your ISP resolves all IPs > to some > dumb error page, you can override that) > 2) ability to setup a wildcard DNS pointing at some IP (i use this > for work *.acre.z points > at my laptop) > 3) ability to have certain domain pathes be resolved by a different > DNS server then > the default one (I use this for VPN, so that only my work DNS > requests go to the work > DNS server) Well, I haven't ever needed something like this yet, but I guess it wouldn't hurt to have it either. Basically, libbind would try to forward the calls to the net_server - if that one isn't running, it would fall back to the default resolver. Bye, Axel. ____________________________________________________________________________________ Veja quais são os assuntos do momento no Yahoo! +Buscados http://br.maisbuscados.yahoo.com