Am 29.03.2014 um 21:48 schrieb Axel Dörfler <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Am 28/03/2014 22:42, schrieb Jonathan Schleifer: >> … and use cmd:cc / cmd:c++ instead. > > As long as the two aren't completely compatible and interchangeable (as in > drop-in replacement), Clang is designed as a drop-in replacement indeed. And that works for most software quite well. The exception is software that depends on heinous GNU extensions ;). > that change doesn't make sense (as they actually could not be built with > clang), and if they are, it's not needed, as clang could just provide g++ and > gcc, too. You can install clang and gcc alongside and have the cc / c++ symlink point to the compiler you prefer. > Am I missing something? :-) Yes, currently, clang calls gcc for linking, which would result in calling itself then ;). -- Jonathan