Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx> wrote: > I would be more careful with the term "POSIX compliant". Haiku is > still > quite a bit away, and BeOS was worse. But we do want to be as POSIX compatible as possible. And technically, this is all that is keeping us from being really compliant -- unimplemented functions or not, this is a real show stopper. > Anyway, it certainly doesn't harm to try, but I have little hope that > this > will have any effect. If the standard maintainers consider the > request, > they are in a dilemma. Undoing the Issue 6 error codes change means > that > all the applications that relied on it would become non-conforming. I know. Maybe they can deprecate it again. So it would be kinda conforming, but we still have a better position when placing appropriate patches. Bye, Axel.