On 2010-12-07 at 01:25:05 [+0100], Rene Gollent <anevilyak@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx> wrote: > > Using the other gcc may or may not work better. There's also a > > not-yet-finished graphical debugger (Debugger -- it's not in the image by > > default) which you could try, though Rene seems to have ran into a > > different problem with it trying to debug StyledEdit. > > All the problems I was running into with the graphical debugger are > now fixed (or at least all the ones I've managed to encounter). > However, none of them appear to be a deeper underlying issue, and were > simply errors/omissions in the graphical debugger's DWARF handling. Is > it perhaps possible that this is simply due to our gdb being from 2004 > and not supporting some of the things the newer gcc is throwing in? I wouldn't rule that out per se, but our gdb version does already support one of the later DWARF 3 drafts, so it probably has better support for DWARF 3 than Debugger does. I haven't had a closer look at what changes in DWARF 4, but Debugger wouldn't support that either yet. CU, Ingo