On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Michael Lotz <mmlr@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Sorry to tell, but this comes too late now. It would require a bit of > discussion and we simply don't have the time anymore to have them. Yes of course. Unfortunately I only just noticed it, but I guess most users will get a kick out of it instead of seeing it negatively. > The hostname as well as the user and groupnames can be edited post install > if necessary. True, though I don't know if there is documentation on this. For example I don't know offhand how to do it though I'm sure it isn't terribly hard. > Also I thought we had the discussion of codenames. Right > now it is called "R1/alpha1", which I find descriptive and easy to > understand. Yes I agree, there is probably no point in setting up an unneeded secondary mapping between some fairly random code name and R1/alpha1, R1/alpha2, etc. -- Regards, Ryan