On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Axel Dörfler <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > It is indeed, I think the delay is just too long. I think half of it > should be more appropriate. OK, I'll tweak it a bit. Since I'm using the pulse time (1/10 second) the closest to half I can do is 2 or 3 tenths of a second. -- Regards, Ryan