Axel Dörfler <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > jonas@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > Log: > > Return of the on-stack buffer. > > Well, the optimal solution would of course take both ways into > account... just in case you feel like changing that method again some > day ;-)) I thought about it, was about to suggest it, but I scrapped the idea. Mostly because I don't want to spend any more time on this crap method. /Jonas.