Ryan Leavengood <leavengood@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 1/4/11, Axel Dörfler <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > They aren't strange, and just denote a float instead of a double. > > In > > functions that take float they make sense to use, and might even be > > needed in order to calm down some compiler warnings. > Well the use of f wasn't strange, what was strange was stuff like 4. > f, > which I think we can all agree is not good style. It's the shortest way to express such a constant, and perfectly valid. Why is that not good style? Just because the 0 is omitted? Bye, Axel.