Stephan Assmus <superstippi@xxxxxx> wrote: > On 2010-01-17 at 20:00:35 [+0100], Axel Dörfler <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > > superstippi@xxxxxx wrote: > > > Implemented display of current size/total size copied and current > > > copy > > > speed. > > > It will begin to play after a short time (10 seconds). > > Nice! But isn't 10 seconds much too long? Many operations won't > > even take > > that long, and I would still like to know the copy speed in those > > cases - > > it might already be more or less accurate much earlier (like 2 > > seconds I > > would guess). > Unfortunately, it's quite erratic with our current I/O scheduler. > With 2 > seconds intervals, it may change for example between 70 MB/s and 7 > MB/s > (same harddisk). Also, if the whole process lasts less than 10 seconds > anyway, I don't really see the point in knowing how fast it is. In > any > case, it is possible to display it almost immediately by changing the > algorithm slightly. I'll play with that. It will certainly be at the > expense of raising false hopes in the beginning of a copy process... > :-D Thanks! I'd say we could keep it like this for a while, and if we then decide waiting a bit more is the better idea after all, then we could just change it back (or find something inbetween that works good enough). The I/O scheduler and most importantly, the write back strategy will definitely change in the future, so that might bring more stable numbers, too. Bye, Axel.