On 29/07/2014 22:15, François Revol wrote: > Hi, > > On 29/07/2014 22:06, Stephan Aßmus wrote: >> This is beyond lazy and IMHO unacceptable. Cleaning up the repository to >> fix useless package descriptions will be no fun, most likely it will >> never get done. These have to be sensible from the moment a package is >> first made available. >> >> When I search for stuff and stumble across one of these packages, I want >> to know exactly what it is and what it is good for, and I assume I am >> not the only one. To get an idea of what the description of >> libpthread-stubs should have been, see >> >> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/6.3/general/libpthread-stubs.html >> >> Please update the packages with proper information about them. I don't >> want to google the package name when the description should have been >> right there in the package. > > For all the things I added recently always I looked up the gentoo ebuild > for the summary and added a proper description from the website as well. > > Those I added long ago when trying to get libXpm building and I suppose > I ended up angry at the shitload of useless dependencies just for libXpm. Actually according to git I'm not the one to blame for the lame descriptions anyway :-D François.