On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Ryan Leavengood <leavengood@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:03 PM, <jscipione@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> This reverts commit 733be65954f85c0c0cd57d0bec95d8a47f9d1f4a. >> >> It didn't fix the bug, will try again. > > These are famous last words, so to speak, but I'm pretty serious about > starting work on Deskbar2 (for lack of a better name) pretty soon, so > I'd suggest not wasting time fixing bugs in the current Deskbar. Those are some famous last words there too, re-writing an app always seems easier in the beginning... If it's all the same to you, I'd like to try to fix the bugs in Deskbar 1.x. > I know you done quite a bit of work on it, so if you are interested in > helping or have suggestions for Deskbar2, let me know. I have some doubts about a Deskbar rewrite being a practical reality anytime soon (R1 timeframe) since, well, it does a lot of stuff, and people like stuff, and you aren't going to reproduce all the stuff in Deskbar 2.0 that Deskbar 1 does, so, people won't be happy with Deskbar 2.0 because it doesn't do x even though it is better at doing y and z. It's like X.org and Wayland. Wayland is the new hotness that everybody drools over, but, X.org is steadily being improved too and is what everybody uses until Wayland matures. Now for R2, Deskbar 2.0 sounds great, but, we're not there yet. If you'd like to get a head start on Deskbar 2.0 though be my guest, I'll most likely have some ideas for it down the road. :)