Am 11/02/2013 10:26, schrieb Ingo Weinhold:
"Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >Am 10/02/2013 21:46, schrieb hamishm53@xxxxxxxxx: >> 2675e31: BUrlRequest: fix various issues >BTW what is the general feeling towards BUrlRequest vs. BURLRequest? +1 for the former. The latter style gets really unreadable when there're two consecutive acronyms in an identifier. But even with only one readability is significantly worse.
I agree on the readability. But since this affects mostly class names, I don't think that this is a sufficient argument: Our current API is full of counter examples like ID vs. Id -- and I would really like to stay consistent. I think Qt uses the QUrl style everywhere, while Java is completely inconsistent which I find very annoying.
Subword navigation also works better with the former.
That actually depends on your editor; Eclipse does it alright, Pe not yet. Bye, Axel.