Am 29.01.2013 um 17:36 schrieb Siarzhuk Zharski <zharik@xxxxxx>: > Stephan Aßmus писал 29.01.2013 16:41: >> Am 29.01.2013 15:52, schrieb Rene Gollent: >>> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 7:46 PM, John Scipione <jscipione@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> Minor style correction here. Shouldn't authors be in alphabetical >>>> order by last name and email be surrounded in <>'s instead of >>>> separated by a comma? So the authors list should look like this: >>> >>> Alpha order, yes, angle brackets, no. >> >> I was always under the impression that we add ourselves to the bottom >> of the list when we first work on a file. > > I do the same. In my opinion, chronological order is more informative and > honors priority. ;-) If you happen to rewrite almost everything and substantially improve it, then it does not. :-) It's really a matter of what is the case in most existing files and what is actually written in the rules. It *may* be the case that a lot more people did it like we did, and that it perhaps makes sense to change the rules so that more files already comply to them. But one way isn't necessarily more logical than the other. Best regards, -Stephan