2013/1/10 Urias McCullough <umccullough@xxxxxxxxx>: >> { >> - if (options == MTX_DEF) { >> + if (options & MTX_DEF) { >> mutex_init_etc(&mutex->u.mutex.lock, name, >> MUTEX_FLAG_CLONE_NAME); >> mutex->u.mutex.owner = -1; >> - } else if (options == MTX_RECURSE) { >> + } else if (options & MTX_RECURSE) { >> recursive_lock_init_etc(&mutex->u.recursive, name, >> MUTEX_FLAG_CLONE_NAME); >> } else > > If that's the case, shouldn't those theoretically be separate if > statements rather than using else? > > Or are those mutually-exclusive flags? The both we care of are exclusive since they are types. On the other hand, MTX_QUIET and MTX_DUPOK are option flags. But as I now understand, MTX_DEF means *default* and shouldn't be tested... fixed hopefully in hrev45147. Thanks for the note! Bye, Jérôme