FYI -- Yi-Kai Tsai (cuma) <yikai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Asia Regional Search Engineering.
--- Begin Message ---
- From: Devaraj Das <ddas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Yi Kai Tsai <yikai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Vivek Ratan <vivekr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 18:51:11 +0900Hi Yi-Kai, no that's not concrete as yet. People are thinking of various failover strategies ranging from cold-cold -> warm-warm -> hot-hot. This is a work in progress currently (and is still under investigation where potential solutions are Linux HA suite, Zookeeper-based solution, etc.).. Thanks, Devaraj On 12/16/08 3:00 PM, "Yi-Kai Tsai" <yikai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > hi Devaraj and Vivek > > I am looking for further information regarding namenode automatically > fail-over? > Its rely on zookeeper right? any JIRA # or roadmap information? > > Weeks ago when I gave talk of hadoop, some audience (none yahoo) are > using hadoop as production component directly, > though current namenode is not really unstable , but single point > failure is always a concern. > > thanks
--- End Message ---