On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Doug Philips <douglas.philips@xxxxxxxxx>wrote: > On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 08:52, gwen <gwenix@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> The only thing I'm worried about for the latter is that here's the >> issue: we want people to drift back and chat with us. Are we going to >> say, "Sorry, you need to pay before you get here?" Probably not. But >> given that, are people who paid to get back there going to be >> resentful? I'm trying to avoid this latter, and I'd like to do so by >> putting a lot of niceties in for people who pay. >> > > I didn't attend the Halloween party last year, so I don't know how that > worked. > I too was questioning if we would have a gate keeper who would ask for a > ticket before letting someone into "our" space, or what? If we're going to > do a raffle, is it just with the "door tickets" or will people be able to > buy more tickets after they've arrived? We'll need someone to handle the > money (and keep an eye on it). > ***** Lots of people took turns at the door for the Halloween party last year. Same for the raffles. We had a table and sold however many tickets you wanted to buy, I think it was $1 per ticket or you got a deal if you wanted like an arms length or a foot of tickets. Wrangling all that is logistics. > > Is it physically feasible to have a "must have ticket to enter" (and then > how do you re-enter if you have used the facilities or made another trip to > the bar). Maybe these questions are all obvious to everyone else having been > to the venue, which I never have. > ****** We had shiny wristbands for the Halloween party for everyone that paid. You pay at the door, you got a wristband, you could go wherever you wanted including the bar downstairs and come back up. > > >> But yes, it's all about perception: How can we maximize the benefit of >> having paid to get into the party without too much effort or money put >> in ahead? And keep in mind that since this is a fundraiser/members >> drive, we do get some leeway on the "we're doing this for the club" >> factor. >> > > I think you've hit the nail on the head, because I feel a tension between > "this is a fundraiser" and "this is a PR event to raise awareness of the > shop and what we do." Fundraisers deliberately overcharge for some "benefit" > as people understand that they're paying extra to support the organization. > "PR" events deliberately undercharge to get people to come in and get hooked > (at least that is the olde schoole approach). The drink ticket fears I > think are partly a reflection of the confusion about what kind of event this > is. As Derrick put it, "what am I getting for my $5", is definitely the kind > of question someone going to a PR event would ask. "$5 for a drink, Great!" > is the kind of reaction you would expect for a fundraiser. > > But it could be a throwie, not a drink, or some other thing (too bad we > can't make LED faux ice cubes or something, spend $2 on parts and charge $5 > for the entrance. Your glowing ice cube is your hacky holidays version of > the typical event 'hand stamp'). > ***** YES YES YES - why not get something "hacky" and in line with the entire theme of the shop, than force drinks on those that don't want them? > > -Doug > >