More study needed on long-term metal-on-metal cancer risks Tuesday, April 10, 2012Nottingham PostFollow A BRITISH Medical Journal investigation looked into the potentially high level of toxic metals from failing hip implants which may, in future, affect thousands of people around the world. The investigation also looked at why these hip replacements were allowed despite the risks being known and documented for decades. A study commissioned by the National Joint Registry of England and Wales and carried out by scientists from the Universities of Bristol and Exeter, looked at whether these concerns were valid. Results were published last week. The study found that patients who have had metal-on-metal hip replacements were no more likely to develop cancer in the first seven years after surgery than the general population. But the study also recognised that a longer-term study was required to give a better picture of cancer risk after that time period. The National Joint Registry of England and Wales contains records of over one million procedures from at least 97 per cent of orthopaedic units. Every year registry data and hospital episode statistics are linked up to check how patients who have had joint replacements are faring. In this study cancer rates in patients with metal-on-metal hip replacements were compared with both a group of patients who had other hip bearing surfaces implanted and the general population. The data covered 40,576 patients with metal-on-metal hip implants and 248,995 who had other types. Results showed that the chance of a 60-year-old man with moderate health and a metal-on-metal stemmed hip replacement being diagnosed with cancer in the five years following surgery is 6.2 per cent, compared to 6.7 per cent chance with hip replacement using other bearing surfaces. For women, it was 4 per cent for metal-on-metal and 4.4 per cent for other bearing surfaces. from Vanessa The Google Girl. my skype name is rainbowstar123