[glideplan_swproj] Re: CMake, Licences , ...
- From: Kuba Marek <blue.cube@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: glideplan_swproj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 21:10:41 +0100
Ok ... I'll just quit wasting time on this. We can always sort this out
later.
> AFAIK, BSD license is GPL-compatible (not vice-versa), so there
> shouldn't be any problem with re-licensing a BSD code under GPL.
>
> Cestmir
>
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 2:59 AM, Kuba Marek <blue.cube@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> > I've been playing with CMake this evening, specifically with
> > autodetection of osg and osgearth. It all seems to work
> > automagically on linux, if you're on windows or have some weird
> > setup you'll need to specify two paths when first configuring the
> > project.
> >
> > I used two cmake module files. The first one is for osgEarht, a
> > sligt remix of a module I found on the web and it's already pushed.
> > It didn't mention licences inside so I just used it.
> > The second file (for osgQt) is based on a part of CMake distribution
> > (osgDB) and has a scary comment about being "Distributed under the
> > OSI-approved BSD License" I don't know if it's ok to use that ...
> > and my brain hurts when trying to find out.
> >
> > The question now is how careful we want to be about this. Any ideas?
> >
> > Good Night
> >
> > Kuba
> >
Other related posts:
