[gha] Re: (peace from harmony) About Peace Actors
- From: Surendra Pathak <pathak06@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "() Peace from Harmony" <peace-from-harmony@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 23:23:24 +0530
[image: diwali greetings]
*Warm wishes to all GHA members and friends *
*Happy Diwali to all*
Dr. Surendra Pathak,
*Professor & Head, Department of Value Education,
**Direc**tor-Research & Dean-Social Sciences**, *
*Project Director**: Interdisciplinary Research Projects & World Conference
on Existential Harmony **(*www.existentialharmony.org/*) *
http://iaseuniversity.academia.edu/SurendraPathak
*Vice President GHA, President- GHA-INDIA * (www.peacefromharmony.org),
*Special Consultant* :IAEWP (www.iaewp.org),
*Member, WCPA* (www.wcpa.biz/),
*Member, Advisory Board* : Ground Report India
www.groundreportindia.com<http://www.groundreportindia.com/p/advisory-boards.html>
websites : www.coexistence.in
*IASE Deemed University, Gandhi Vidya Mandir, Sardarshahar, 331401,
Dist-Churu, Rajasthan, India, Mobile: +91-9414086007,
www.iaseuniversity.org.in, www.gandhividyamandir.org.in,
www.bttc-gvm.org.in/, www.iaseve.org.in*
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Leo Semashko <leo.semashko@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> **
>
>
> Dear Bruce,
>
> Let me first tell you about one detail. Your treatment "everyone" to the
> GHA colleagues and friends, at least from the point of view of Russian
> perception, does not sound like the best way, not by friendly but with a
> shade of neglect and arrogance. Could you use a more dignified treatment
> for the GHA members? Thank you.
>
> Thank you for your sensible response. I think all will agree that this
> incident with you is exhausted, and we are continuing our cooperation.
>
> Your remark about the classes as actors of peace and what you do not know
> them reflects the typical state of the traditional peace studies that
> ignore and neglect these actors. But they are essential for truly
> scientific thinking and knowledge of peace. Therefore, traditional studies
> are far from science, although they may contain some private achivements
> that are important for the future GPS. This science can not be without an
> analysis of the spheral classes of the population as universal actors of
> peace.
>
> They are unfolded in the GHA books, especially in *Harmonious Civilization
> * (2009) and *the ABC of Harmony for World Peace …* (2012), as well as in
> my previous book *Tetrasociology: Responses to Challenges* (2002) and in
> my earlier books. I think you understand that a scientific peace theory
> must analyze the social classes as peace actors. This is its central
> subject and object, which only makes it as a science. If we do not know the
> answer to the question: *WHO create peace*, we will never get answers to
> other questions, including *HOW to create peace*, etc.
>
> In this regard, in the content of GHA book about GPS I specially
> formulated the following key chapter: *Historical Universal Actors of
> Global Peace: Harmonious Spheral Classes of the Population*. In this
> chapter, I will analyze different class theories and compare them with the
> tetrasociological theory of four differing but harmonious classes of the
> population, ensuring global peace as its actors, sources and final causes
> in nature of society as a whole. These analyses and comparisons are
> scattered across my books for almost 40 years and in different projects of
> GHA for the 9 years, which I will have to summarize and develop up to date.
> This chapter will give you, like everybody, exhaustive scientific answer to
> question about the peace actors in the different peace and sociological
> theories and especially in GPS. Your question helped me to formulate a new
> chapter in it. Thank you.
>
> With love, best harmony wishes,
>
> Leo
>
> Dr Leo Semashko:
> State Councillor of St. Petersburg,
> Philosopher, Sociologist and Peacemaker from Harmony;
> Director: Tetrasociology Public Institute, Russia;
> Founding President, Global Harmony Association (GHA) since 2005;
> Director, GHA Website "Peace from Harmony": www.peacefromharmony.org
> Global Peace Science from Harmony:
> www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=585 and
> In Russian: www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=606;
> World Interfaith Harmony Project on the ABC of Harmony Base:
> www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=541;
> GHA Program Book, The ABC of Harmony for World Peace:
> www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=478;
> GHA Peace Video: http://youtu.be/hbxY5lREOeA;
> My Web page: www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=253;
> Address: 7/4-42 Ho-Shi-Min Street, St. Petersburg 194356, Russia
> Phone: 7 (812) 597-65-71; Skype: leo.semahko
> Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/leo.semashko?ref=tn_tnmn
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Bruce Cook, AuthorMe.com, cookcomm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To: leo.semashko@xxxxxxxxx
> Sent: 25 октября 2013 г., 16:18:07
> Subject: (peace from harmony) The Term - Bruce, we could forgive you,
> but the last time
>
> Dear Leo, everyone,
>
> Thanks, Leo, for your kind note.
>
> I was responding to your request that I give a public response to these
> terms. I'm just searching for the basis for needing a new term - an
> explanation of why we need to consider social classes when we discuss peace
> theories. Perhaps one social class approaches peace in a different way than
> another? The fact that GHA has been doing this for years doesn't really
> answer the question. I still don't have an answer, and that's why I voted
> against these terms.
>
> But, yes, please forgive me for whatever I may have done to offend you. I
> love working with you and everyone at GHA.
>
> Bruce
> Bruce L. Cook, Ph.D.
> President, GHA-USA
> Vice-President, GHA
> Vice President for Publicity, International Association of Educators for
> World Peace
> President, World Writers Resources, Inc.
> Author, *Harmony of Nations: 1943 – 2020*, Just Fiction Editions, 2012
> 1407 Getzelman Drive
> Elgin, IL 60123 USA
> 312-859-8090
> cookcomm@xxxxxxxxx
> www.harmonyofnations.com
> http://www.author-me.com
> http://www.articlesonpeace.com
> *http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&keyT4*<
> http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&keyT4>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Leo Semashko <leo.semashko@xxxxxxxxx>
> *To:* "Bruce Cook, AuthorMe.com" <cookcomm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> *Cc:* "peace-from-harmony@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <
> peace-from-harmony@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "gha@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <
> gha@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "ghausa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <ghausa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> *Sent:* Friday, October 25, 2013 7:04 AM
> *Subject:* Re: (peace from harmony) The Term - Bruce, we could forgive
> you, but the last time
>
> Dear Bruce,
>
> I am very hard, sad and unpleasantly to write to you.
>
> I asked you in my letter only the following: "Please, let us know your
> opinion as expert in English, as writer and editor about term PEACELOVELOGY
> for GPS?"
>
> What I can now answer to your unmotivated aggressive attack against
> tetrasociology without a single scientific argument? Your letter of October
> 21, limited by this attack and aggression: "*to vote against using
> tetrasociology*." I asked you to say about the term and you have
> threatened the GHA entire organization. Where is here your peace and
> harmony?
>
> The whole year you, like a dove, assured me and GHA in your love to *the
> ABC of Harmony*, to harmony, to the GHA mission based on tetrasociology
> and now – *you urge* to vote against it all GHA! It's like the kiss of
> Judas. This is a betrayal of the GHA in which you are the renegade.
>
> You ignore that the GHA is based on tetrasociology 9 years old, it's the
> GHA spiritual foundation. It is the science of global peace from harmony.
> Tetrasociology and its *ABC of Harmony* is an unprecedented "*fundamental
> revolution in science and paradigm shift in human consciousness emerging
> from the most advanced thinking of the 20th century*" (Glen Martin). "*The
> ABC of Harmony is the dawn of a shining, harmonious vision of peace and
> prosperity for all the nations of the planet Earth!"* (Abdul Kalam) and
> etc. GHA created on this basis, for 9 years, 7 books and 48 projects that
> are an unprecedented contribution to the social science and global peace.
> And you're suggesting us abandon it, *vote against tetrasociology*, which
> gives life to the GHA? Do you want to take away from us our life? I think
> you do not understand because of your ignorance in tetrasociology what you
> write.
>
> You reject the peace actors - this is nonsense and stupidity! Without the
> scientific definition of the peace actors it will never be reached.
> Tetrasociology only gives them the scientific definition. You ignore its
> scientific advantage and historical dignity.
>
> If you would denied the dignity of any organization, for example, if you
> offered to vote in Norman’s organization *against economic and social
> justice*, and in Glen’s organization *against his Constitution* and in
> Kurt’s organization *against his interspirituality* and so on to anyone,
> you know that you immediately shown to the door.
>
> You have been unable to understand peacemaking nature of tetrasociology
> and did not try to explore it. I am happy that none of the GHA members for
> 5 days did not support your aggressive urge: "*to vote against
> tetrasociology*." The GHA trust to you here was rendered zero. In such
> cases, usually, resign.
>
> But we are ready to forgive your act of aggression and to offer you pursue
> your technical functions in the GHA that you are doing well and free you
> from participating in the GHA new book based on tetrasociology. You have a
> lot of other advantages besides theoretical, for which we can appreciate
> you in the GHA. So we could be forgiving your mistake with your aggression
> with the hope that such a mistake will not be repeated in the future.
>
> Could you learn from your mistakes now?
>
> With love to peace, best harmony wishes,
>
> Leo
>
> Dr Leo Semashko:
> State Councillor of St. Petersburg,
> Philosopher, Sociologist and Peacemaker from Harmony;
> Director: Tetrasociology Public Institute, Russia;
> Founding President, Global Harmony Association (GHA) since 2005;
> Director, GHA Website "Peace from Harmony": www.peacefromharmony.org
> Global Peace Science from Harmony:
> www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=585 and
> In Russian: www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=606;
> World Interfaith Harmony Project on the ABC of Harmony Base:
> www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=541;
> GHA Program Book, The ABC of Harmony for World Peace:
> www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=478;
> GHA Peace Video: http://youtu.be/hbxY5lREOeA;
> My Web page: www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=253;
> Address: 7/4-42 Ho-Shi-Min Street, St. Petersburg 194356, Russia
> Phone: 7 (812) 597-65-71; Skype: leo.semahko
> Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/leo.semashko?ref=tn_tnmn
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Bruce Cook, AuthorMe.com, cookcomm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To: leo.semashko@xxxxxxxxx
> Sent: 21 октября 2013 г., 23:32:38
> Subject: (peace from harmony) The Term - TetraMysteries
>
>
> Everyone,
>
> Leo has specifically invited me, personally, to contribute my thoughts
> publicly on the "linguistic/epistemological" question he has asked of the
> group. I had planned to remain silent since not many would be likely to
> accept my thoughts, but I will respond now that I have been personally
> invited.
>
> As indicated earlier, I think we simply need a book on peace. Its title
> could be something mile "Viewpoints on Peace" or a similar name. However,
> as far as I can see, Leo insists that the book is to be primarily on his
> 4-class system (which, incidentally, is so reminiscent of earlier, failed
> class-based systems of government that emerged from Russia in years past).
>
> The group may not be aware, but several leaders in peace movements,
> formerly GHA members, have dropped out because they are ashamed to
> associate themselves with the group's current activities.
>
> There are over 200 of us, and I have posed the question more than once.
> Can't anyone answer?
>
> In what possible way does this "tetra" system have any relationship to
> peace. In the most recent proposed chapter we see a clear description of
> the four classes, and we are informed that world peace will come from their
> understanding.
> But please bear with me on this. Isn't true that the four groups, as a
> totality, represent *everyone* in the country under consideration? And,
> if so, then isn't it logical that, when we say *they *should understand
> something, aren't we really saying that *everyone *should understand
> something? It's a tautology, for it brings us back to the question of how
> to achieve peace. All that Tetrasociology does is to say that everyone -
> all four classes - must understand it. But what does that matter. Isn't the
> main question *how* to achieve world peace. Not *who* will do it.
>
> Which basically makes the 4-group system no more than a description of the
> participants.
>
> Despite this, we in GHA are being advised that knowing these four groups
> somehow constitutes a radical new science, an amazing new branch of
> academia. When in fact, as with many areas in academia, it is nothing more
> than a new way to say old things.
>
> A few weeks ago I urged everyone to vote against using tetrasociology as a
> basis for the new book. I thought the problem I cite above would be
> self-evident. But I see very little reaction either way, except from our
> leader. So, someone please help me. In what way does breaking the
> population into these four groups have anything to do with achieving world
> peace? I must be missing something. Sadly, nobody seems willing to address
> this very central problem. And, without addressing it, the entire "system
> of thought" under consideration is without merit.
>
> I ask again, without any expectation of change this time. What would be
> wrong with GHA simply working on the problem of how best to achieve world
> peace? Why waste our time on these 4 sociological groups?
>
> I apologize if I have interfered with a groundbreaking new academic
> discussion. I planned to hold back my thoughts, but I was invited to
> comment to the entire group.
>
> Yours in peace and harmony,
>
> Bruce
>
> Bruce L. Cook, Ph.D.
> President, GHA-USA
> Vice-President, GHA
> Vice President for Publicity, International Association of Educators for
> World Peace
> President, World Writers Resources, Inc.
> Author, *Harmony of Nations: 1943 – 2020*, Just Fiction Editions, 2012
> 1407 Getzelman Drive
> Elgin, IL 60123 USA
> 312-859-8090
> cookcomm@xxxxxxxxx
> www.harmonyofnations.com
> http://www.author-me.com
> http://www.articlesonpeace.com
> *http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&keyT4*<
> http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&keyT4>
>
> ===========================
>
> Dear GPS coauthors and GHA members,
>
> We have identified with you, in the first approximation, the GPS’s book
> Contents, the architecture of this science and the architecture of global
> peace, which found expression in the GPS Laws. All of these are published
> here: www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=585
>
> Now before GHA there is a new epistemological question of linguistic
> character: which term we may choose to name/title GPS? This is not an idle
> question, as the name of each science – it is its terminological and
> linguistic constituting in the language of scientific knowledge of
> humanity, as well as its broad praxiological (practical, social,
> technological and user) process.
>
> We know that GPS is still not exists, therefore, naturally, there is no
> term to title this science. The GHA is a pioneer in this field. GHA first
> became aware of this science and its social need in the 21st century and
> the first attempted to create it for more than eight years on the basis of
> scientific theory of social harmony, the most detail presented in the GHA
> book "*The ABC of Harmony for Global Peace* ... "
> (2012: *www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=478)
>
> *But GHA still have not found the term for this science name. *Today I am
> pleased to offer you for discussion and approval of this term in the first
> approximation for 3 days up to October 23 inclusively by your YES or NO
> with your comments*. Naturally, I want to stress once again that our
> choice is not final, we will return to it throughout the whole year of
> creation of this GPS book. Our initial selection will be just the beginning
> in the definition of the term for the GPS title.
>
> The most typical way to form the name of science in history of human
> knowledge is a synthesis of the two terms, one of which expresses the
> subject area of science, and the other - the Greek term "logy", expressing
> scientific knowledge, a science of this field. For example: sociology - the
> science of society, psychology - the science of psyche, biology - the
> science of life, geology - the science of earth, and so on. Of course,
> other ways of forming the name of science also exist, but today we will
> experience this way.
>
> We might think, based on these assumptions, the GPS name can create very
> easy and simple: you combine two words – “peace” and “logy”. However, the
> term "peacelogy" is already used in Russian and English. Search of GOOGLE
> shows 3,500 cases of its use in the Russian language (as MIROLOGY), and 740
> cases of its use in the English language. Their analysis led to the
> following conclusions.
>
> The term MIROLOGY in Russian language discredited by the religious sects (
> *http://www.antimodern.ru/mirology.html*), neo-Marxists
> (*http://kommunika.ru/?p=6302*), literary pranksters (
> http://frumich.livejournal.com/216144.html, *
> http://zvezdochet.livejournal.com/88954.html*), unfounded claims to
> "innovation logical thinking in psychology – MIROLOGY” (*
> http://region70.ru/Drugoe/Ostalnoe/16560/?inf=1*), etc. This term has
> been involved in the Russian language on the identity of conscious or
> unconscious confusion of two completely different concepts - THE WORLD AS
> COSMOS (the surrounding universe) and PEACE AS LACK OF WAR IN HUMAN
> SOCIETY. In the English language on Chinese websites usually it is used in
> the sense of "Philosophical Peacelogy, the Spirituality of peace": (*
> http://m.riss.kr/search/Search.do?queryText=znSubject,Philosophical+Peacelogy&searchGubun=true&colName=re_a_kor&detailSearch=true
> *) or in licensing, marketing and so on, that is far from the GPS.
>
> Therefore, this term is not suitable to describe and express GPS name, to
> avoid any association with discredited or different meanings of this term.
>
> The GPS is a new science, which opens a new era of world history - the era
> of peaceful harmonious coexistence among the peoples of the Earth, which
> excludes any war. This era is fundamentally different from past, military,
> era of humanity. Therefore, GPS, which begins this era of humanity,
> requires a new and appropriate title, not aggravated by the vicious or
> narrow senses of the past era. In terms of this criterion, I can offer a
> choice of one of three "pure" (they are not in GOOGLE) terms for the GPS
> title:
>
> 1. Peacelovelogy - combines two universal values of "peace" and "love"
> with "logy"
> 2. Peaceharmonylogy - combines two universal values of "peace" and
> "harmony" with the "logy"
> 3. Tetrapeacelogy - combines the value of "peace" with its four dimensions
> of "tetra" and "logy"
>
> From the point of view of the GPS scientific content, the third term is
> the most appropriate and accurate, as it expresses the four-dimensionality
> of social harmony and global peace from this harmony. But their
> four-dimensionality, as well as the appropriate term "tetra" are virtually
> unknown for science and social consciousness, so they will cause constant
> questions and doubts, for example: What is a tetra? Why is tetra, not a
> trio, duo, etc.? The four-dimensionality and its term must first find
> acceptance in science to become an element of the GPS name. Therefore, this
> term can not be considered preferable.
>
> The second term also can not be called preferred by the same arguments,
> despite the fact that harmony is the ultimate cause and source of global
> peace. But it is also not known yet science and social consciousness.
>
> The most preferred is first term, the values components of which are
> positive, universal, well- known for world culture and are recognized all
> over the world. They emphasize the love to peace not war, and they exclude
> the war. Of course, they do not differ by rigorous science of GPS but they
> express its fundamental commitment: to love peace, therefore, always and
> everywhere to produce it that is the main meaning of global peace and its
> science.
>
> Therefore, Global Peace Science is, in truth, PEACELOVELOGY. Conversely:
> Peacelovelogy is Global Peace Science, born in the 21st century by the GHA
> and marking a new era of humanity - Global Harmonious Peace. To this era
> was devoted the GHA first book of 27 authors from 12 countries in 12
> languages: *Harmonious Era Calendar*, 2006: *
> www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=190*
>
> As for the rigorous scientific understanding of this term, it may be added
> to it in the future, when this understanding will find universal
> acceptance.
>
> Hence, I choose the first term of the three proposed and invite other
> members of the GHA to support this choice as the best to date that do not
> excepts the offers and discussion of other options.
>
> As you can imagine, this is a very important voting and a very important
> choice for the GHA, so I invite all its members to take an active part in
> it and express your YES to the first term. Of course, the last word may be
> for each of you.
>
> Thank you for your participation in the democratic choice of the term for
> the name of GPS as a turning scientific knowledge for history of humanity.
>
> With love to peace and best wishes for peace from harmony,
>
> Leo
>
> Dr Leo Semashko:
> State Councillor of St. Petersburg,
> Philosopher, Sociologist and Peacemaker from Harmony;
> Director: Tetrasociology Public Institute, Russia;
> Founding President, Global Harmony Association (GHA) since 2005;
> Director, GHA Website "Peace from Harmony": www.peacefromharmony.org
> Global Peace Science from Harmony:
> www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=585 and
> In Russian: www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=606;
> World Interfaith Harmony Project on the ABC of Harmony Base:
> www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=541;
> GHA Program Book, The ABC of Harmony for World Peace:
> www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=478;
> GHA Peace Video: http://youtu.be/hbxY5lREOeA;
> My Web page: www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=253;
> Address: 7/4-42 Ho-Shi-Min Street, St. Petersburg 194356, Russia
> Phone: 7 (812) 597-65-71; Skype: leo.semahko
> Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/leo.semashko?ref=tn_tnmn
>
>
>
>
> __._,_.___
> Reply via web
> post<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/peace-from-harmony/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJxdnVzMWxjBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzE5OTQ1OTU0BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTc1OTMzNQRtc2dJZAM1Nzc5BHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA3JwbHkEc3RpbWUDMTM4Mjc4MTcxMQ--?act=reply&messageNum=5779>
> Reply
> to sender
> <leo.semashko@xxxxxxxxx?subject=Re%3A%20%28peace%20from%20harmony%29%20About%20Peace%20Actors>
> Reply
> to group
> <peace-from-harmony@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=Re%3A%20%28peace%20from%20harmony%29%20About%20Peace%20Actors>
> Start
> a New
> Topic<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/peace-from-harmony/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJmamVtb3UwBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzE5OTQ1OTU0BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTc1OTMzNQRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNudHBjBHN0aW1lAzEzODI3ODE3MTE->
> Messages
> in this
> topic<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/peace-from-harmony/message/5767;_ylc=X3oDMTM1anJ1NWFnBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzE5OTQ1OTU0BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTc1OTMzNQRtc2dJZAM1Nzc5BHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA3Z0cGMEc3RpbWUDMTM4Mjc4MTcxMQR0cGNJZAM1NzY3>(10)
> Recent Activity:
>
>
> Visit Your
> Group<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/peace-from-harmony;_ylc=X3oDMTJmMDc2ajZqBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzE5OTQ1OTU0BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTc1OTMzNQRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzEzODI3ODE3MTE->
> More detailed information about our community is located on our
> International Website "A New Culture of Peace from Social Harmony and
> Children’s Priority" (shortly "Peace from harmony")
> www.peacefromharmony.org.
> It unites now about 200 co-authors/members from 34 countries of the world
> and it is published in 15 languages.
>
> [image: Yahoo!
> Groups]<http://groups.yahoo.com/;_ylc=X3oDMTJldWN2dHViBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzE5OTQ1OTU0BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTc1OTMzNQRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTM4Mjc4MTcxMQ-->
> Switch to:
> Text-Only<peace-from-harmony-traditional@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=Change+Delivery+Format:+Traditional>,
> Daily
> Digest<peace-from-harmony-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=Email+Delivery:+Digest>•
> Unsubscribe<peace-from-harmony-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=Unsubscribe>•
> Terms
> of Use <http://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/> • Send us
> Feedback
> <ygroupsnotifications@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=Feedback+on+the+redesigned+individual+mail+v1>
> .
>
> __,_._,___
>
Other related posts:
