[geocentrism] Re: squabbles.
- From: Regner Trampedach <art@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 06:12:00 +0200
Sifting through 28 postings with the heading
"Re: Is geocentrism supported by facts?"
I found only one entry to add to the list!
If this is the best you can do, I don't think
geocentricity has much of a future, and I would
have to conclude that I waisted my time. Please
prove me wrong.
Regards,
Regner
Quoting Regner Trampedach <art@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> Thanks, Philip
>
> - Regner
>
> Quoting philip madsen <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> > All, perhaps it might help in this period if one changed the subject line
> > when squabbling about something, and reserving the main theme subject ,
> >
> > "Is geocentrism supported by the facts" for nothing other than the 5
> > responses Regner requested.
> >
> > Meantime Steven, this thunderbird email client which filters the mail into
> > slots, interests me very much. Can you tell me more about how to get it.
> >
> > Regner did not specifically ask for geocentric supporting facts. His
> actual
> > words were,
> >
> > "I would like to start this discussion by asking you to state the
> > 5 most fundamental reasons that your theory is correct. "
> >
> > Pauls theory, and mine differ from Allens. They will all go into the
> melting
> > pot of Regners summary for discussion, thats if any sort of coherent
> > consensus for geocentrism emerges. So far not so good.
> >
> > Philip.
>
>
Other related posts:
