Ok Below is what I call "middle of the road" science.. Howard Johnson, in the patent below, used a jargonistic terminology not used in electrical engineering, that I know of , like " unpaired electron spins" .. Deducting this into lay language, I think he is referring to what is a reasonable theory explaining the magnetic field in a ferrite (or other) permanent magnet as being due to electron motion in the atoms of the molecules of the material, which are aligned without any counterbalancing reverse electron flow. In other words we have electron flow (simulated current) which produces a field just as we do in an electrical solenoid. A look at any field diagram of a solenoid and you will get the picture. This only adds to the old molecular domain theory and does not destroy it. He calls this a superconducting property, which I suppose it is similar to, considering there is no electrical resistance offered to aligned electron motion in an atom, or any electron motion in an atom for that matter. It is only when we apply an emf to force electrons away from their natural place that we get resistance to real electrical current. However, even with superconductors, if the magnetic reaction which occurs in the electrical solenoid due to motor/generator action (taking power) occurs, and it must, then how is this going to be reflected back to the electrons and the atoms of which they are part. In the motor, this energy of electron flow is taken from the electrical supply. I am not above accepting that this may be a nuclear power phenomenon. But I do not mean normal nuclear power, which is something else. As soon as I examine the practical aspects of this patent, if there is a flaw, and I always suspect it, I will find it and get back to you.. Meantime any party interested in also looking, all of the patent can be followed from the following links. click on the page numbers. Home [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [S&M] or http://www.newebmasters.com/freeenergy/4151431-pg1.html If nothing else it will be a stimulating exercise..The last thing the Money Manipulators want is free energy.. Its a serious threat to their phoney funny money nterest bearing credit. Phil . United States Patent [19] Johnson [11] 4,151,431 [45] Apr. 24, 1979 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- [54] PERMANENT MAGNET MOTOR [76] Inventor: Howard R. Johnson, 3300 Mt. Hope Rd., Grass Lake, Mich. 49240 [21] Appl. No.: 422,306 [22] Filed: Dec. 6, 1973 [51] Int Cl.2 ..................... H02K 41/00; H02N 11/00 [52] U.S. Cl. ..................................... 310/12; 310/152 [58] Field of Search ............. 24/DIG. 9; 415/DIG. 2; 46/236; 273/118 A, 119 A, 120 A, 121 A, 122 A, 123 A, 124, 125 A, 126 A, 130 A, 131 A, 131 AD, 134 A, 135 A, 136 B, 137 AE, 138 A [56] References Cited U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS 4,074,153 2/1978 Baker et al. ....................310/12 Primary Examiner -- Donovan F. Duggan Attorney, Agent, or firm -- Beaman & Beaman [57] ABSTRACT The invention is directed to the method of utilizing the unpaired electron spins in ferro magnetic and other materials as a source of magnetic fields for producing power without any electron flow as occurs in normal conductors, and to permanent magnet motors for utilizing this method to produce a power source. In the practice of the invention the unpaired electron spins occurring within permanent magnets are utilized to produce a motive power source solely through the superconducting characteristics of a permanent magnet and the magnetic flux created by the magnets are controlled and concentrated to orient the magnetic forces generated in such a manner to useful continuous work, such as the displacement of a rotor with respect to a stator. The timing and orientation of magnetic forces at the rotor and stator components produced by the permanent magnets to produce a motor is accomplished with the proper geometrical relationship of these components. 28 Claims, 10 Drawing Figures