[geocentrism] jim mccanney's view
- From: "philip madsen" <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "geocentrism list" <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 06:33:06 +1000
A scientist, admittedly a bit eccentric, puts a good case! And don't gloat at
"eccentric" .. Most of the GOOD discoverers of science were considered
eccentric by their rather mediocre peers. Phil.
October 27, 2008 posting ... ever notice that there is no science news in the
regular news media that amounts to a hill of beans ... certainly not from the
USA anyway ... last week india planned to join efforts to orbit the moon with a
photo mission ... already china and europe and japan are there photographing
the moon in high resolution ... since there is no atmosphere it should be
pretty basic and the results with the cameras they are using will allow
resolution down to a few inches ... notice that one of the major announcements
you would expect from these efforts would be a photo of at least one of the
alleged Apollo landing sites ... pretty quiet on those fronts ... to date about
70% of the american public are convinced that NASA never went to the moon ...
hardly fits into the "conspiracy theory" category of a few lunatic nut cases
that some try to portray ... what is my personal feeling ??? well it is simple
and as i have stated publicly many times ... NASA has made a scientific claim
... a pretty big scientific claim ... that they sent and landed men on the moon
and retrieved them successfully ... everyone was impressed and there was lots
of press and even new york ticker tape parades ... but any scientific claim
has a simple requirement ... that it be verified by at least ONE INDEPENDENT
UNBIASED OBSERVER (which then leads to more independent observations) ... to
date this has never been done ... NASA depends on hoping you will listen to a
bunch of NASA paid yea yea cheerleaders ... most of whom were not even born or
at best were filling their diapers daily when the first Apollo landing
allegedly took place (not exactly a place i would look for reliable information
!!!) ... so back to the multitude of high resolution cameras taking pictures of
the lunar surface ... the alleged landing sites would be easy to spot
especially the long shadows of the landers AND especially the alleged tracks of
the lunar rover ... so where are the pics that would provide the required third
party verification ??? as i said ... it's pretty quiet on that front ... true
science is not a matter of he said she said they said ... real scientific proof
is simple and logical AND VERIFIABLE ... and with NASA now pulling $3 billion a
year alleging they are going to try this again ... one might expect that they
should at the very minimum ... prove that they actually went there the first
time ... and by the way ... be sure to join me on my weekly radio show this
week for some real commentary on real science as i continue to describe the
physics of a hypothetical large passing comet by a planet (based on my
theoretical and observed nature of comets) and relate it to what the ancients
described ... jim mccanney
Other related posts:
- » [geocentrism] jim mccanney's view
