[geocentrism] Re: chatter stevens

  • From: Bernie Brauer <bbrauer777@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 18:48:40 -0800 (PST)

Dictator. Tyrant. Despot.    

: ~ )
   
   
  philip madsen <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
       I would cut off their water supply and power to their house till they 
changed their mind.
   
   
    ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Steven Jones 
  To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 10:37 AM
  Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Two spin axes of Earth?
  

philip madsen wrote:           Not to forget the vast field of Radio 
astronomy... much more exciting in some ways even if there are no hubble like 
pictures.. 
  Phil
No, no, no, no!!! Use your eyes! All these big stupid machines of men overlook 
the beauty of the creation!!! Radio telescopes are exceptionally boring.

Steven.
      ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Paul Deema 
  To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 9:59 AM
  Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Two spin axes of Earth?
  

  Neville J
  I didn't mention telescopes but I get your point. I also understand that 
astronomers today do not sit in freezing conditions, watering eyes straining at 
eyepieces and sketching intermittently on a pad with a pencil held in one of 
those fingerless glove things.
  Paul D

Neville Jones <njones@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
      Paul,

The diffraction limit of "big expensive" telescopes is not achieved in the real 
world. Also, no astronomer is "directly examin[ing] the universe," but rather 
making observations in a terrestrial laboratory and seeking to promote and 
understand those observations within the currently accepted model.

Neville 

  www.GeocentricUniverse.com


    -----Original Message-----
From: paul_deema@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 18:17:37 +0000 (GMT)


        Jack L
I doubt one person in a hundred would regard this statement as patronising. 
There was an attempt at humour in there -- perhaps that is what has sparked 
your ire?
  What Regner is doing that only a very small percentage of the overall 
population is doing -- is being a professional astronomer. He gets to use lots 
of big expensive exciting equipment to directly examine the universe. I don't 
know about you but I'm envious.
  Paul D
  

  ----- Original Message ----
From: Jack Lewis <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

  Dear Paul,
  Why did you find it necessary to patronise Regner in that way? Regarding the 
'real thing' what in heavens name is Regner doing that no-one else is?
   
  Jack
    ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Paul Deema 
  To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 

    Allen D
I'd be careful about advising Regner to refer to a model. He doesn't need one. 
He plays with the real thing!
  Paul D









  Paul D
  
  
---------------------------------
  National Bingo Night. Play along for the chance to win $10,000 every week. 
Download your gamecard now at Yahoo!7 TV.   
  
---------------------------------
  No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.29/1124 - Release Date: 11/11/2007 
10:12 AM

    
---------------------------------
    
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.29/1124 - Release Date: 11/11/2007 
10:12 AM


 __________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Other related posts: