> [Philip wrote] > > I do not think this passage is for or against GC. Think real hard. . In the helio centric >system, (a scientific possibility, and a good logical assumption) when God talked to His >people, back then, what would they have thought if He had written in Joshua, "The Earth >stopped" ...? Philip, are we talking about the same God who directed the Children of Israel to march around the walls of Jericho and sound their trumpets occasionally? What must they have thought about that instruction? I don't think there'd have been any problem with telling the truth, if that be what a-centricism is. The ancients and ourselves should have been rather thankful for it, I would think. > Even had that been true, and God never lies, it would have been meaningless to the people, > so He would have spoken according to convention, Philip, would he now? Is that a rule of God's, to speak "according to convention"? Although God has been said to speak in tongues, if He only speaks in an understandable way to the people, he's sure left us out of the loop with some of Revelations, for a small example. > > The science is not important here. That He suspended nature is! Philip, I repeat Bouw's phrase again. It says it all. "To say that God didn't bother to tell us the plain truth makes God a clumsy grammarian." Logically, if you are going to claim "figurativeness" or "phenomenological language" for Joshua 10:12-13, you must admit you will run into the snare of which verses to apply that interpretation to, while others are accorded "literal" treatment. Although you are correct that many verses are problematic if taken literally, I think it is incumbent upon Christians to face up and figure them out or just admit we do not know. I believe that your use of "figurative" glasses to see the solution to difficult Biblical passages sweeps this honest problem too conveniently under a rug. > > My message... Do not let your salvation rest upon HC GC or any other C. The >supernatural life is outside of science. Its internal between you and God. Even Mikes self >alledged atheism, is judged by Him on High, not us. Neville would be the first to >acknowledge that. > Philip. Philip, Isaiah 1:18 says "Come, let us reason together." Although I do feel that the "supernatural life", as you call it, is outside, nay, beyond and higher than science, I don't mean for that to persuade Christians to be uninvolved in scientific issues, as if this world here and now doesn't matter. Because if it doesn't matter, then any Christian would behoove himself by visiting Jack Kervorkian straight away, or finding the nearest building to jump off of. A better place awaits so why not get there quicker! And yes, God did tell us not to judge, lest we be judged. I do think that Mike and all the other atheistic BA-er's are making some good points and we need to overcome those things or give it up as far as geocentrism goes. I am not smart enough to address some of those things....I'd like to see it happen, though. I will concede once more that Biblical credence hangs in the balance. What I would like to tell Mike is that, irregardless of geocentrism, a lack of belief in God is illogical based simply upon the overwhelming evidences of creationism, though as I recall you will have some unique objection to that assertion. Gary Shelton -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.7 - Release Date: 2/10/05