He has obviously he does not comprehend "Mach's principle". If he did he would not appeal to descriptions of effects of "forces"he does not even begin to grasp for explanations that troubled even Eienstein and crew. It is ironic when folk claim to be educated "people of science"make these kinds of statements, the "simpletons" if any are folks like this. They neither understand what does and does not constitutes proof nor are they even aware that his examples of "evidence" for "science" is based on assumptions that make far more logical and demonstratable sense in a GC Universe.......???? Like so many people they donʼt know what they are talking about ( although they are clearly indoctrinated properly into the "Copernican Faith") yet they want to ridicule others not only for the something they themselfʼs engage in but donʼt even begin to grasp. ----- Original Message ---- From: Bernie Brauer <bbrauer777@xxxxxxxxx> To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 8:40:34 AM Subject: [geocentrism] Response from Geocentrism two-pager sent Rob wrote: > * There is NO proof that the Earth rotates on an "axis" daily and orbits the sun annually. None. Dear Bernard, I got bored, so I just thought I'd mention that the entire cause of the weather patterns and ocean currents on the Earth (i.e. cyclones and anti-cyclones, jet stream, gulf stream etc.) is due to it's rotation. You'll also find that Naval gunners have to allow for this annoying little FACT called the coriolis force, also due to the Earth's spin. As the first line on your spam email is guff, I won't bother to comment on the rest. With no respect whatsoever could I suggest that people who ignore science in favour of religious twaddle and then think they can force it down other people's throats are weak-minded simpletons. Rob Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.